• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Trinh Nguyen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Southeast Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Hong Kong Policy Paralysis Erodes Special Position to Benefit of Peers

While investment in Hong Kong may not change rapidly, continued uncertainty will erode the foundations that have made Hong Kong special in the minds of global businesses.

Link Copied
By Trinh Nguyen
Published on Sep 19, 2019

Source: Hill

For decades, Hong Kong has thrived with its unique status, facilitating investment and trade between Asia and the West. Its airport, seaport, and railways link goods, services, and travelers to the region for trade and commerce, with rising connectivity with mainland China. While Chinese cities are investing heavily in hard infrastructure to rival Hong Kong, what is truly irreplaceable about Hong Kong is its special status, or “one country two systems,” that puts it in a unique position compared to the tightly controlled Chinese economic and financial system that includes import duties, value added taxes, capital controls, and restrained labor mobility.

Behind the capital market power of Hong Kong is its unique “soft infrastructure” that China has relied on to deal with the economic shortcomings of the mainland, especially access to international capital markets. Hong Kong is an important springboard for foreign direct investment, as 64 percent of inward foreign direct investment to the mainland comes from Hong Kong and 65 percent of outward foreign direct investment was also channeled through Hong Kong between 2010 and 2018. Hong Kong has long been the largest offshore center for China and holds a special access to Chinese equity and fixed income markets through stock and bond connections. The city took 73 percent of initial public offerings from mainland companies overseas from 2010 to 2018.

It is not just capital but also labor that can move freely in Hong Kong. Both Hong Kong residents and foreign residents enjoy relatively unrestricted travel due to fewer visa restrictions. The Hong Kong government markets itself to the international business community as the primary location for doing business in Asia and with mainland China. With the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, the United States has treated Hong Kong as a special autonomous region and exempts it from many tariffs imposed on China.

Thanks to this, whether it is tourism, finance, or trade, Hong Kong is punching above its weight as regional and global players take advantage of this special status. Hong Kong International Airport, for example, boasts to be the largest air cargo hub, while the deepwater seaport ranks seventh busiest in the world. Hong Kong, with a population of 8 million, welcomed an impressive 65 million tourists last year.

The reexporting of goods is also huge, amounting to one and a half times the gross domestic product. Beyond trade and tourism, Hong Kong is seen as a parking place for regional wealth, given its strong property rights, rule of law, and open capital account. Real estate transaction value in Hong Kong last year was 23 percent of gross domestic product due to strong demand and perception of excellent storage of wealth.

While rapid integration with mainland China has served businesses, Hong Kong residents face increased competition from mainlanders for public goods, and believe upward mobility may be limited by more competition for assets and employment opportunities with China. The prolonged protests that shutdown the prized hard infrastructure of Hong Kong, especially its airport, and the clear ineffectiveness of policymakers in deescalating the tension indicates to investors that Hong Kong may not be the special and trusted place they initially thought it was.

Hong Kong now finds itself at risk as investors are looking to diversify. This current unrest limits investor security in bringing business to Hong Kong, but also increases scrutiny of Hong Kong businesses seeking to expand in other markets. Australia has already begun to treat investment from Hong Kong with the same scrutiny as the rest of China. In the United States, Congress is considering the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act that would leave the city vulnerable to American sanctions.

While Hong Kong is unlikely to face American sanctions, and the Chinese government still sees value in its ability to access global capital markets, investors are likely to hold off on additional investments in the city due to rising doubt surrounding its future. In a recent survey, 88 percent of businesses without offices in Hong Kong say that the political standoff would affect their future investment decisions, and 75 percent of those with offices there say that it would impact future investment decisions. 

The bottom line is that while investment in Hong Kong may not change rapidly, continued uncertainty will erode the foundations that have made Hong Kong special in the minds of global businesses. Other cities like Singapore are viable alternatives to Hong Kong for businesses seeking a foothold in Asia. But it is not just Singapore. Malaysia and Thailand have already seen an influx of investment into luxury real estate at the expense of Hong Kong. Tourism in Thailand also experienced a surge over the summer as mainland Chinese tourists stayed away from Hong Kong.

The policy paralysis to resolve the difficult equation of Hong Kong being special while rapidly integrating with China, not just in economics but also in soft infrastructure, is increasingly jeopardizing investor faith in the sustainability to remain autonomous as it assimilates with China. Investors are asking when it will ultimately be subsumed into the mainland and lose its special status for businesses wishing to engage with the Chinese economy. The longer this goes on, the more fear from investors will drive them to hedge by engaging with competitors of Hong Kong.

This article was originally published in the Hill.

About the Author

Trinh Nguyen

Former Nonresident Scholar, Asia Program

Trinh Nguyen was a nonresident scholar in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    BRICS Expansion and the Future of World Order: Perspectives from Member States, Partners, and Aspirants
      • +16

      Stewart Patrick, Erica Hogan, Oliver Stuenkel, …

  • Commentary
    Indonesia’s Controversial Fuel Price Hike Was Actually Necessary

      Trinh Nguyen

Trinh Nguyen
Former Nonresident Scholar, Asia Program
Trinh Nguyen
Political ReformEconomyEast AsiaChinaSoutheast Asia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Paper
    India-China Economic Ties: Determinants and Possibilities

    This paper examines the evolution of India-China economic ties from 2005 to 2025. It explores the impact of global events, bilateral political ties, and domestic policies on distinct spheres of the economic relationship.

      Santosh Pai

  • Article
    Hidden Tides: IUU Fishing and Regional Security Dynamics for India

    This article examines the scale and impact of Chinese IUU fishing operations globally and identifies the nature of the challenge posed by IUU fishing in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). It also investigates why existing maritime law and international frameworks have struggled to address this growing threat.

      Ajay Kumar, Charukeshi Bhatt

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

  • Research
    Views From Taipei: Essays by Young Indian Scholars on China

    This compendium brings together three essays by scholars who participated in Carnegie India's Security Studies Dialogue in 2024, each examining a different aspect of China’s policies. Drawing on their expertise and research, the authors offer fresh perspectives on key geopolitical challenges.

      • +1

      Vijay Gokhale, Suyash Desai, Amit Kumar, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.