• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

The North Korean Waiting Game

On May 12, the United States, North Korea and the other members of the 6-Party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program will hold a first round of working level talks. Don’t expect any progress, however, either at these talks or anytime until after the November U.S. election. Both sides are playing the waiting game and hoping the circumstances will improve their position after the election.

Each day that passes allows North Korea to advance its nuclear capabilities and further establish itself as the ninth nuclear weapon state. The exact size of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is a mystery, but press reports suggest that portions of the U.S. intelligence community believe Pyongyang has quadrupled its arsenal to 8-9 weapons in the past year.

Link Copied
Published on May 5, 2004

On May 12, the United States, North Korea and the other members of the 6-Party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program will hold a first round of working level talks. Don’t expect any progress, however, either at these talks or anytime until after the November U.S. election. Both sides are playing the waiting game and hoping the circumstances will improve their position after the election.

Each day that passes allows North Korea to advance its nuclear capabilities and further establish itself as the ninth nuclear weapon state. The exact size of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is a mystery, but press reports suggest that portions of the U.S. intelligence community believe Pyongyang has quadrupled its arsenal to 8-9 weapons in the past year. It’s not known if North Korea is willing to trade its nuclear capabilities for a new relationship with the United States, but it is clear that the price they may demand for yielding their nuclear assets has gone up, not down, since the slow moving nuclear crisis began in October 2002. It also appears that Pyongyang hopes to find a more willing negotiating partner should Senator John Kerry win the November election.

The Bush administration continues to hold to a tough public line, maintaining that the U.S. will only improve relations with Pyongyang once that state agrees to the complete, verified, and irreversible dismantlement of its nuclear program. The goal is the right one, but demanding that Pyongyang move first to disarm before any benefits begin to flow to the North has allowed North Korea to play the victim in the international arena. Even close U.S. allies in the region are asking the U.S. to show more flexibility. It appears, however, that the United States is prepared to maintain this line as long as the negotiating process, such as it is, continues. On-going talks, despite a total lack of progress, allow the President and his campaign to maintain the U.S. is successfully managing the nuclear issue, when in fact it is moving closer and closer to growing out of anyone’s control. In the end, the President’s advisors believe they will be in a stronger position to negotiate if and when they win re-election.

So with both sides waiting out the clock, there is little hope that progress will be made anytime soon. However, as the clock continues to tick, Pyongyang may look to create an even greater crisis at a time of its choosing to put pressure on the U.S. to negotiate under duress. Previously, such gambits were unsettling. Now that North Korea’s nuclear capabilities are coming of age, they are more dangerous than ever.

Additional Resources:

  • North Korea Country Resources
  • "North Koreans Agree To Mid-Level Talks," Washington Post, 30 April 2004
  • "N. Korea Nuclear Estimate To Rise," Washington Post, 28 April 2004

Click here to return to ProliferationNews.org

South Korea

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    Raja Mandala: India and the Korean Dream

    New Delhi and Seoul should focus on building flexible middle power coalitions in Asia to limit the impact of the current volatility in the relations between the United States and China.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Book
    Strategic Asia 2016-17: Understanding Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific

    This book examines how the region’s major political powers view international politics and the use of military force.

      Ashley J. Tellis, Alison Szalwinski, Michael Wills

  • Commentary
    Strategic Culture, National Security, and Policymaking in the Asia-Pacific

    Material factors can explain why certain outcomes occurred the way they did, and strategic culture can explain how countries thought about their circumstances, their choices, and their decisions.

      Ashley J. Tellis

  • Commentary
    The Great Game Folio: Peripheral Diplomacy

    Although geography limits New Delhi’s role in East Asia, Modi is betting India can win friends and partners through active engagement.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Commentary
    Beyond Vikrant

    As India celebrates the launch of the Vikrant, the much delayed first indigenous aircraft carrier, Delhi is not the only one in Asia focused on the virtues of airpower at sea.

      C. Raja Mohan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.