• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

Tonnes of Fun

There are over 3,700 metric tons of plutonium and highly-enriched uranium in global stockpiles, according to a recent report by the Institute for Science and International Security.

Link Copied
By Ben Bain
Published on Sep 12, 2005

There are over 3,700 metric tons of plutonium and highly-enriched uranium in global stockpiles, according to a recent report by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS).  Global Stocks  of Nuclear Explosive Materials, authored by David Albright and Kimberly Kramer, says that these materials, together with the 140 tonnes of Neptunium 237 and Americium, are enough for over 300,000 nuclear weapons. 

The report estimates that at the end of 2003, 50 countries held a total of 1,900 tonnes of HEU, with nine of those countries in possession of at least 1 tonne.  Nearly 91 percent of global HEU is in military stockpiles.  According to the report, “stocks of civil HEU are decreasing as HEU is blended down into low enriched uranium” and by 2020, “the number of countries with a kilogram of HEU could decrease from about 50 to no more than 10 or 20 countries,” due to take-back programs initiated by the United States and Russia to consolidate civil HEU stocks. 

Over the next 15 years, global stocks of separated civil plutonium will not decrease significantly.  In fact, the report says, despite the “consensus in the international community that stockpiles of separated plutonium should be minimized because they are a proliferation hazard,” currently “the amount of separated (unirradiated) civil plutonium in the world continues to increase.”  At the end of 2003, 25 countries had at least 5 tonnes of plutonium.  Problems that will lead to continued unirradiated plutonium increases “include the separation of more plutonium than can be used, delays in gaining approvals in loading MOX fuel, and the impact of unexpected events such as nuclear accidents or incidents that further delay MOX programs.”

The ISIS report also estimates the number of potential nuclear weapons Israel, India, Pakistan, and the DPRK could build from estimated fissile material stockpiles through the end of 2003.  Israel is believed to have the capability to produce around 145 nuclear weapons, whereas India and Pakistan could produce around 80 and 70 respectively.  Estimates vary for the DPRK, ranging from 3-9 weapons. 

The study also notes that “separated plutonium and both separated and irradiated HEU in [certain] countries…are of special concern because of the risk of diversion for use by terrorists.” Russia, Pakistan, and North Korea are some of the “most important to understand and secure.”  

The report provides detailed tables and charts on national and global holdings.

About the Author

Ben Bain

Former Junior Fellow, Nonproliferation Project

Ben Bain
Former Junior Fellow, Nonproliferation Project
Nuclear PolicyNuclear Energy

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    After the Border Clash, Will China-India Competition Go Nuclear?

    Asia’s two largest nuclear powers have never threatened each other with nuclear weapons. How much will the recent deadly border clashes between China and India change the security landscape?

      Toby Dalton, Tong Zhao, Rukmani Gupta

  • Commentary
    Reading the Singapore Summit Statement: Three Principles and One Political Gesture

    In the course of one morning in Singapore, U.S. President Donald Trump and the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un have begun to loosen a deeply entrenched and hostile relationship.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Commentary
    Raja Mandala: America’s New Powerplay in Tehran

    U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal appears to have put regime change at the very center of the new American power play against Tehran.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Commentary
    Raja Mandala: Lessons From Korea

    The South Asian stalemate is likely to endure even as South and North Korea appear poised to turn the page.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Commentary
    Raja Mandala: Curing Rawalpindi

    While the Trump administration’s efforts to get tough on Pakistan face challenges and potential dangers, the change in stance signals a new political will to pursue previously untried measures which offer some hope of success.

      C. Raja Mohan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.