The conflict did not reshape Arab foreign policy; on the contrary it exposed its limits.
Angie Omar
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Palestine"
],
"topics": []
}REQUIRED IMAGE
The widening division between Fatah and Hamas threatens any chance for a diplomatic breakthrough on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Neither Palestinian faction is moving closer to reconciliation with or capitulation to the other side.
WASHINGTON, Aug 24—The widening division between Fatah and Hamas threatens any chance for a diplomatic breakthrough on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Neither Palestinian faction is moving closer to reconciliation with or capitulation to the other side, concludes a new commentary from Nathan J. Brown.
Security and economic gains in the West Bank are temporary and unsustainable—and unlikely to inspire a broader Palestinian rejection of Hamas. Recent championing of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad’s efficient governance style as a new model for democracy in the region ignores the inherent shortcomings of governing only half of the Palestinian Authority.
Key Conclusions:
Brown concludes:
“The grim reality is that the Palestinians now have two political systems that are lurching farther away from each other, and neither one seems to have a viable strategy for realizing its vision or building a better future for the people it purports to lead.”
###
NOTES
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
The conflict did not reshape Arab foreign policy; on the contrary it exposed its limits.
Angie Omar
Implementing Phase 2 of Trump’s plan for the territory only makes sense if all in Phase 1 is implemented.
Yezid Sayigh
The objective is to lock Hamas out of political life, but the net effect may be negative indeed.
Nathan J. Brown
In the aftermath of the October 7 attacks, the Israelis have transformed their neighbors’ borderlands to serve their own security interests.
Armenak Tokmajyan
As the forever war in the territory has defined its future, this future may well be forever misery.
Nathan J. Brown