• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush",
    "Hans Timmer"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Western Europe",
    "France",
    "Germany",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Europe's Latest Summit

Europe's latest leaders summit was important, but it was just a step in a multi-year process of redressing the situation.

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush and Hans Timmer
Published on Dec 19, 2011
How important was the latest deal at the European leaders summit on the eurozone?
Uri Dadush
It was an important summit, but it was just a step in a multi-year process of redressing the situation. Under any scenario this is not a decisive moment in the crisis. Despite the agreements to tighten fiscal discipline and seek treaty change to cede some sovereignty over fiscal policies, there were three key things that were missing from the latest deal.

First, the European Central Bank has not committed explicitly or implicitly to providing a backstop for the long term. Second, while governments agreed to raise up to $270 billion for the International Monetary Fund to aid indebted countries, this is not enough money for an important, durable solution—or the so-called bazooka that people are looking for. And third, there is no clear path toward fiscal integration and eurobonds that could ultimately resolve the crisis. This is left as a distant possibility with Germany and France at this point dead-set against it.

Read more

So the deal reached at the European summit is only a step and leaves many questions unanswered. Much of the burden of the readjustment over the long term is on the countries in trouble. There continues to be a very serious question about their political capacity to follow through with what promises to be many more years of austerity and falling incomes.
 
Hans Timmer
While it moves Europe in the right direction, the latest agreements won’t solve the problems. The deal for greater fiscal discipline will help provide political cover to governments implementing steps—this is important. But what I find best about this effort is the move to revise the treaty to further centralize policies. For that some autonomy needs to be given up.

The move to a more centralized Europe is the right solution. There are people who say that this is not the issue and won’t calm the markets, but this is actually extremely important. Europe can’t wait to show where it is headed.

Europe is at a fork in the road and can either go for more centralization or fragmentation. There are pros and cons to both, but I think it’s helpful that Europe is choosing the path to greater centralization.  MORE►

————————
Hans Timmer is the director of the World Bank's development prospects group.

About the Authors

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

Hans Timmer

Authors

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
Hans Timmer
EconomyWestern EuropeFranceGermanyNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Paper
    Egypt’s Military Landlord Economy and its Limitations

    The armed forces champion a form of capitalism that is generating revenue, but its reliance on rent faces diminishing returns, leaving the country with massive sunk costs and deferred returns, deepening dependency on external borrowing.

      Yezid Sayigh

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Syria’s Mandatory Imperial Tribulation

    In an interview, Elizabeth Thompson recalls how the country formulated a liberal constitution in 1920, before being denied by France and Britain.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Unpacking Lebanon’s Gap Law

    In an interview, Ishac Diwan looks at the merits and flaws in the draft legislation distributing losses from the financial collapse.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Has Sisi Found a Competent Military Entrepreneur?

    Mustaqbal Misr has expanded its portfolio with remarkable speed, but a lack of transparency remains.

      Yezid Sayigh

  • Research
    Arab Diaspora Business Communities in Egypt

    Arab diaspora business communities in Egypt often mirror the same systemic challenges facing Egyptian businesses.

      • +4

      Nur Arafeh, Yezid Sayigh, Qaboul al-Absi, …

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.