• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Shi Zhiqin",
    "Li Lianxing"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China and the Developing World",
    "China’s Foreign Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie China

FOCAC and BRI Bring Reciprocal Benefit for China and Africa

The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) was established far earlier than the BRI, and it has become a sophisticated framework for China’s partnerships with African countries. Thus, FOCAC can be a mini-version of multilateral cooperation that aids the implementation of BRI projects.

Link Copied
By Shi Zhiqin and Li Lianxing
Published on Sep 4, 2018

Source: CGTN

A rising continent, Africa, is expected to be more deeply engaged with China’s grand vision of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Chinese President Xi Jinping, during the country’s biggest diplomatic event in Beijing, encouraged more African countries and entrepreneurs to join this multilateral platform to further increase the quality of bilateral relations.

He said Africa is a natural part of the Initiative and it should be a significant one. He added that China is willing to extend the BRI to more African countries on the basis of equality and mutual benefit.

However, to many of those countries, Xi’s idea is still a new concept. Moreover, challenges are ahead for both to see how this plan will work in an African context.

The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) was established far earlier than the BRI, and it has become a sophisticated framework for China’s partnerships with African countries. Thus, FOCAC can be a mini-version of multilateral cooperation that aids the implementation of BRI projects.

FOCAC offers the foundation of China’s policy toward Africa, and the BRI addresses multilateral platforms and connectivity, which means the BRI is expected to bring Africa into a wider world market.

This relationship is novel to many African countries, and it will take time for them to adjust to these two mechanisms. China also needs to demonstrate the values of the two in a more vivid way.

China’s policies of non-intervention and non-political cooperation are valued by African countries, as they allow independence for suitable development.

As the BRI links more players into the partnership, which has deepened with current partners in Africa, China still sees these policies as vital. China has repeatedly said it won’t export its development “model” to any country as each country has its own unique social-historical background. However, it doesn’t mean China’s development experiences can’t be shared with others.

For African countries, there are more reasons for China to share its development experiences considering their common history and similar starting point. Thus the BRI will not only be a platform of concrete projects, but also a platform of economic and political experience sharing.

Quality of cooperation was another keyword in President Xi’s speech at the event. He said the BRI should rightly identify the bottlenecks of Africa’s development and avoid wasting funds.

During the past few decades of cooperation, both parties have been learning about each other’s tempo and now are more orchestrated. Africa has become more confident to design and develop its destiny and China in return also is more aware of what can be offered to Africa.

It is therefore vital for both to identify and support the key projects that may bring breakthroughs or essential changes to host countries.

Contrary to conventional knowledge that Africa is purely a recipient in the relationship with China, African countries have been developing their own “homegrown solutions” and actively shaping their partnerships with China to achieve goals.

While Africa is developing more high quality ties with China, President Xi has committed to further open China’s market to the world, including Africa, under the BRI framework. This is a golden chance for Africa to reduce its investment deficit with China, and many African entrepreneurs have tasted success.

Many may not know that one of China’s biggest mobile application’s shareholders is from South Africa. It's not only about doing business in Africa, but embracing more African investments in China as well.

Furthermore, President Xi also noted that the BRI is an open and inclusive platform and it welcomes trilateral cooperation with the premise of Africa’s consent. Isolation shouldn’t be the trend, and a more shared and connected world is key to common development for all.

Africa’s development comes at a good time as there are many lessons and experiences to be learned from all over the world; thus trilateral cooperation may make the best use of various parties’ development advantages.

However, Africans don’t hide their concern that trilateral cooperation among Africa, China and the West may drag the continent into colonialism again and greatly impair its independence.

That’s why China has insisted that all possible trilateral cooperation taking place in Africa should fully respect Africa’s willingness and independence and that Africa should take a lead in such projects. The BRI may bring more opportunities to involved players, but all projects should be tested by this principle.

FOCAC and the BRI hope to create a more bonded community for China and Africa so that they can face the current international challenges.

China and African countries not only share a similar history and resonate with each other emotionally, but more importantly, they are all developing countries that can be easily affected by this uncertain and turbulent world. Common challenges and interests form a strong foundation of the bilateral ties between China and Africa.

This piece was originally published by CGTN.

About the Authors

Shi Zhiqin

Former Resident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy

Shi Zhiqin was a resident scholar at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center until June 2020.

Li Lianxing

Authors

Shi Zhiqin
Former Resident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Li Lianxing
Economy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Unpacking Lebanon’s Gap Law

    In an interview, Ishac Diwan looks at the merits and flaws in the draft legislation distributing losses from the financial collapse.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Has Sisi Found a Competent Military Entrepreneur?

    Mustaqbal Misr has expanded its portfolio with remarkable speed, but a lack of transparency remains.

      Yezid Sayigh

  • Research
    Arab Diaspora Business Communities in Egypt

    Arab diaspora business communities in Egypt often mirror the same systemic challenges facing Egyptian businesses.

      • +4

      Nur Arafeh, Yezid Sayigh, Qaboul al-Absi, …

  • Article
    Saudi Arabia in Africa: Sound Economic and Geopolitical Strategy, or Resource Exploitation?

    Largely characterized thus far by a single-minded focus on extractivism, Riyadh must commit to greater equitability in its approach to investment and development deals with Sudan, Ethiopia, and Eritrea.

      Hesham Alghannam

  • A picture taken from a position at the Israeli border with the Gaza Strip shows the destruction due to Israeli bombardment in the besieged Palestinian territory on May 18, 2025
    Article
    Destruction, Disempowerment, and Dispossession: Disaster Capitalism and the Postwar Plans for Gaza

    Once Israel’s war in the territory is brought to an end, the foundational principles guiding reconstruction should be Palestinian self-determination, local agency, and sovereignty.

      Nur Arafeh, Mandy Turner

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.