• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "Rose Gottemoeller"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Western Europe",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

NATO Alliance Remains a Transatlantic Bargain

It has helped to build what the late John McCain called a “league of democracies” to battle the rising tide of autocratic rule. It has been a force multiplier for the U.S. military as it tackles instability, crisis and conflict.

Link Copied
By Rose Gottemoeller
Published on Sep 16, 2020

Source: Columbus Dispatch

President Trump’s impulsive decision recently to remove 12,000 American troops from Germany — without a serious interagency review or consultation with close allies — is just the latest example of how undisciplined and ill-advised his actions toward NATO and Europe have become in the past 3 1/2 years.

As the NATO deputy secretary general from 2016 to 2019, I always marveled at the bipartisan support the alliance enjoys. Since NATO was founded in 1949, every U.S. president and every Congress have worked to deepen transatlantic cooperation. This unwavering support has not only kept the peace for more than 70 years but has also brought more European nations into the alliance to further our shared democratic values. It has helped to build what the late John McCain called a “league of democracies” to battle the rising tide of autocratic rule. It has been a force multiplier for the U.S. military as it tackles instability, crisis and conflict.

Trump’s latest action marks another low point in how he has devalued the alliance and put American security at risk at a time when threats from Russia as well as others are on the increase. Numerous former American officials as well as many European leaders have denounced the move as strategically illogical, financially counter-productive and a self-inflicted wound that benefits only Vladimir Putin. Such an unplanned move fits with no known strategy that can explain how it helps strengthen NATO.

Like many other unplanned actions — accepting Putin’s lame denials of interference in American elections, unilaterally withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal or abruptly withdrawing U.S. forces from Syria and abandoning our Kurdish friends in the line of fire — Trump has displayed an utter disregard for policies that will safeguard Europe and the United States.

In this case, the bases from which those forces depart will now have to be rebuilt in other NATO countries, at our expense. Germany has been for decades the best location to forward base U.S. ground and air forces, to maximize our ability to project power within and beyond Europe. We are sacrificing strategic assets for the sake of satisfying the whim of a president wishing to punish one of our closest military allies and our largest economic partner in Europe.

Taking his ire out on German Chancellor Angela Merkel comes at a time when German and other European support for America is waning. The countless times Trump has questioned NATO’s relevance, threatened not to live up to the collective defense commitment embedded in the NATO treaty’s Article 5 and not responded to Putin’s interference in European and American politics have taken a toll on U.S. respectability and credibility.

We can recall when the U.N. General Assembly collectively laughed at his self-serving references to the great work he had done or when key allied leaders were heard musing about Trump’s missteps on the margins of the London NATO summit. Sadly, many European observers not only laugh publicly, but they openly pity American leaders who have the task of explaining the illogic of American presidential tantrums. Ominously, allies have begun to ignore the White House.

This November, we Americans — Republicans, Democrats and independents — have an opportunity to restore U.S. respect and credibility by electing a President Joe Biden, who along with John McCain has been one of the strongest supporters of the alliance and its role in keeping the peace. Both senators, longtime friends as well as colleagues, saw how much the United States gained from having like-minded allies, prepared to share the burden and blood — as they have in the Balkans as well as Afghanistan — to keep Europe and the United States safe.

This transatlantic alliance is a still bargain and bulwark of security. Let’s be sure we keep up our end of it with a new administration that clearly has America’s strategic interests at heart.

This article was originally published by Columbus Dispatch.

About the Author

Rose Gottemoeller

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program

Rose Gottemoeller is a nonresident senior fellow in Carnegie’s Nuclear Policy Program. She also serves as lecturer at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. Ambassador Gottemoeller served as the deputy secretary general of NATO from 2016 to 2019. 

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    The Spectacular Rise of the “Bad Boys” of NATO During the Ukraine Crisis
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +2

      Judy Dempsey, Alexander Gabuev, Rose Gottemoeller, …

  • Q&A
    Russia Is Updating Their Nuclear Weapons: What Does That Mean for the Rest of Us?

      Rose Gottemoeller

Rose Gottemoeller
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program
Rose Gottemoeller
Political ReformDemocracyForeign PolicyEastern EuropeWestern EuropeIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Corrupted by Absolute Power

    In an interview, Marc Lynch discusses his new book decrying the post-1990 U.S.-dominated order in the Middle East.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Why Does the Middle East Suffer “Forever Wars”?

    Because perpetual conflict enhances control, offers economic benefits, and allows leaders to ignore popular preferences.

      • Angie Omar

      Angie Omar

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    A Military Balance Sheet in the U.S. and Israeli War With Iran

    In an interview, Jim Lamson discusses the ongoing regional conflict and sees an unclear picture when it comes to winners and losers. 

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Egypt’s Discrete Role in the Ceasefire with Iran

    Cairo’s efforts send a message to the United States and the region that it still has a place at the diplomatic table.

      • Angie Omar

      Angie Omar

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Realism and the Lebanon-Israel Talks

    Beirut’s desire to break free from Iranian hegemony may push it into a situation where it has to accept Israel’s hegemony.  

      Michael Young

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.