• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "U.S. Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: A Debate

Leading experts from thirteen countries debate what it would take to achieve the immensely important yet equally difficult goal of reducing the world’s nuclear weapons to zero.

Link Copied
Published on Apr 10, 2009

WASHINGTON, Apr 6—President Obama has called for a world free of nuclear weapons. But many influential people in the United States and abroad question whether this objective is desirable or feasible. In a follow-up to George Perkovich and James M. Acton’s groundbreaking paper, Abolishing Nuclear Weapons, leading experts from thirteen countries debate what it would take to achieve the immensely important yet equally difficult goal of reducing the world’s nuclear weapons to zero.

The editors note that none of the nuclear-weapon states "has an employee, let alone an inter-agency group, tasked full time with figuring out what would be required to verifiably decommission all its nuclear weapons." Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: A Debate begins the serious discussion of the conditions necessary for total disarmament.

Perkovich and Acton invited a distinguished group of current and former officials and respected defense analysts—from nuclear-armed and non–nuclear-weapon states—to recommend new paths toward disarmament and the best ways to verify and enforce new measures. Their responses are published in this volume, together with the original Adelphi Paper, and a response by Perkovich and Acton.

###


INCLUDED IN THIS VOLUME

  • George Perkovich and James M. Acton: Abolishing Nuclear Weapons (reprint)
  • Lawrence Freedman: Nuclear Disarmament: From a Popular Movement to an Elite Project, and Back Again?
  • Frank Miller:Disarmament and Deterrence: A Practitioner’s View
  • Jonathan Schell: The Power of Abolition
  • Brad Roberts: On Order, Stability, and Nuclear Abolition
  • Harald Müller: The Importance of Framework Conditions
  • Bruno Tertrais: Advancing the Disarmament Debate: Common Ground and Open Questions
  • Achilles Zaluar:A Realistic Approach to Nuclear Disarmament
  • Scott D. Sagan: Good Faith and Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations
  • Takaya Suto and Hirofumi Tosaki: Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: A Japanese Perspective
  • James E. Doyle: Eyes on the Prize: A Strategy for Enhancing Global Security
  • Patricia Lewis: Verification, Compliance, and Enforcement
  • Ian Hore-Lacy: Nuclear Power and Proliferation: A Nuclear Industry Perspective
  • Pan Zhenqiang: Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: Why Not Outlaw Them First?
  • V. R. Raghavan: Nuclear Abolition: Need for a Phased Plan
  • Sameh Aboul-Enein: The Roadmap to Total Nuclear Disarmament
  • Ernesto Zedillo: The Role of International Institutions in the Disarmament Process
  • Zia Mian: Beyond the Security Debate: The Moral and Legal Dimensions of Abolition
  • George Perkovich and James M. Acton: What’s Next?

EXCERPTS

  • "The problem is…the impression of cynical disdain, as the nuclear powers insist that the non–nuclear weapon states strictly follow treaty obligations while showing indifference to their own."
    ~Sir Lawrence Freedman
  • "This Adelphi paper should be seen in itself as a positive, personal example of American and British cooperation to honor national commitments to work in good faith toward…nuclear disarmament."
    ~Scott Sagan
  • "The vast majority of nations do not possess or seek nuclear weapons. They are likely to support a serious experiment at nuclear disarmament even if it is ultimately unsuccessful. The only way to know is to try."
    ~ James Doyle

NOTES

  • Download the book: www.carnegieendowment.org/nuclearweaponsdebate
  • George Perkovich is vice president for studies and director of the Nonproliferation Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His research focuses on nuclear strategy and nonproliferation, with a focus on South Asia and Iran, and on the problem of justice in the international political economy.
  • James Acton is an associate in the Nonproliferation Program at the Carnegie Endowment specializing in nonproliferation and disarmament. A physicist by training, Acton’s research focuses on the interface of technical and political issues, with special attention to the civilian nuclear industry, IAEA safeguards, and practical solutions to strengthening the nonproliferation regime.
  • For more on the debate on abolishing nuclear weapons, download video, transcript, and audio from the 2009 Carnegie International Nonproliferation Conference.
  • The 2009 Carnegie International Nonproliferation Conference, “The Nuclear Order – Build or Break” will address the future direction of the nonproliferation regime and offer new recommendations. The Carnegie International Nonproliferation Conference is widely considered the premier event in the field and attracts over 800 government officials, policy and technical experts, academics, and media from around the world.
  • The Carnegie Nonproliferation Program is an internationally recognized source of knowledge and policy thinking on efforts to curb the spread and use of nuclear weapons. Carnegie’s analysis consistently stays at the forefront of proliferation developments and nonproliferation policy debates.
  • Carnegie Proliferation News provides synopses of top news stories related to preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons every Tuesday and Thursday as well as periodic issue briefs on the top news making issues.
  • Press Contact: Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org
Nuclear PolicyNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

  • Commentary
    A Second Trump Term: Will Southeast Asia Tilt Toward China?

    Tapping our network of China experts in the region, Carnegie China offers this latest “China Through a Southeast Asian Lens” report to offer preliminary assessments of whether the U.S. effort to reshape the global trading order will lead countries in the region to tilt toward Beijing. 

      • +6

      Selina Ho, Khin Khin Kyaw Kyee, Joseph Ching Velasco, …

  • Commentary
    Is China Willing to Influence Russia on the Ukraine War?

    Beijing is trying to navigate the overall situation regarding Ukraine, especially the substance of interactions between Washington and Moscow.

      • Ellen Nakashima
      • Zhao Long
      • +1

      Ellen Nakashima, Zhao Long, Pavlo Klimkin, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.