• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Europe emerges as battleground in pricing of natural gas

Consumption of natural gas is growing rapidly and now accounts for nearly one-quarter of the world’s energy supply. While natural gas is relatively clean compared to crude oil and coal, its ability to assume a greater role in meeting the world’s growing energy demands will depend largely on price.

Link Copied
Published on Oct 12, 2010

WASHINGTON, October 12—Consumption of natural gas is growing rapidly and now accounts for nearly one-quarter of the world’s energy supply. While natural gas is relatively clean compared to crude oil and coal, its ability to assume a greater role in meeting the world’s growing energy demands will depend largely on price. In a new report, Anthony J. Melling analyzes the two competing price mechanisms for natural gas: the dominant practice of linking gas prices to oil prices and a second model based on competitive market prices. Although Europe—which uses both mechanisms—is now the battleground in the natural gas pricing war, its effects will likely be felt worldwide.

Key Findings:

  • Growth in consumption. Driven largely by industrialization in Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, the use of natural gas has increased rapidly over the last three decades—growing faster than oil.
  • Connected gas markets. Once-isolated regional gas markets are now interconnected through the rising trade in natural gas. If the commodity pricing mechanism wins out in Europe, oil-indexation would likely be unsustainable worldwide.
  • High-stakes impact. Any modifications to existing gas contracts will directly affect exporters that depend on gas revenue—including Russia, Algeria, Indonesia, and Malaysia—enhance or exacerbate energy security, dictate the sustainability of future supply, and impact the potential to achieve environmental targets around the world.

“The price of gas in Europe—and the mechanism used to determine it—will not only impact European companies and customers, but also have profound implications for energy markets around the world,” writes Carnegie’s Adnan Vatansever in the foreword. “Energy security, geopolitics, and the shift to greener forms of fuel that will be critical for combating climate change will also depend on how gas pricing evolves.”

###

NOTES

Click here to read the full report

Anthony J. Melling is an established authority on gas contracting issues. He has three decades of international gas contracting and market analysis experience, with particular emphasis on the United Kingdom and Continental Europe.

The Carnegie Energy & Climate Program engages global experts working in energy technology, environmental science, and political economy to develop practical solutions for policy makers around the world. The program aims to provide the leadership and the policy framework necessary for minimizing risks stemming from global climate change and reducing competition for scarce resources.

Press Contact: Kendra Galante, 202-939-2289, pressoffice@ceip.org

Climate ChangeNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Carnegie China Scholars on the Biden-Xi Meeting

    Carnegie China scholars share their assessment of the Biden-Xi meeting and its implications for U.S.-China relations going forward.

      • +1

      Paul Haenle, Xue Gong, Ngeow Chow Bing, …

  • Commentary
    Biden and Xi Meet at APEC

    Southeast Asian capitals would prefer that the U.S. and PRC manage their relationship, if not get along.

      Paul Haenle, Chong Ja Ian

  • Article
    Amid Contending Narratives, A Read on U.S. and PRC Messaging in Singapore

    As the world undergoes a new round of fragmentation and major power rivalry that includes the advancing of divergent visions of global order, Singapore is discovering that its interests are increasingly being pulled in different directions.

      Chong Ja Ian

  • Commentary
    Vietnam’s Response to China’s Global Security Initiative

    There is a certain level of restraint, but there is also a lingering distrust.

      Paul Haenle, Huong Le Thu

  • REQUIRED IMAGE
    Commentary
    Missile Defense and the Strategic Relationship among the United States, Russia, and China

    China views U.S. missile defense as posing a greater potential threat to China’s nuclear deterrent than other U.S. military capabilities.

      Tong Zhao, Dmitry Stefanovich

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.