• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

A Letter to the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform

Given preliminary findings from an ongoing analysis of the U.S. transportation system's contribution to the national deficit, there are three important principles that the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform should consider in its final report to the President.

Link Copied
Published on Nov 5, 2010

Source: November 5

On November 5, 2010, the Co-Chairs of the Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency, Bill Bradley, Tom Ridge and David Walker, sent a letter to Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, Chairmen of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Prompted by preliminary findings from an ongoing analysis of the U.S. transportation system's contribution to the national deficit, the letter recommends three important principles for the Commission to consider in its final report to the President by December 1, 2010. 


Dear Chairman Bowles and Chairman Simpson,

We write as Co-Chairs of the Leadership Initiative for Transportation Solvency, an initiative formed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Under our leadership, this initiative will conduct an analysis of strategies to end the U.S. transportation system’s burden on the national deficit. Strategies will be politically realistic but also serve to make transportation better, greener, and more fiscally sound.

The U.S. highway trust fund is broke, unaccountable spending undermines long-term strategic priorities, and infrastructure is crumbling. Failure to reform the transportation system risks deepening U.S. dependence on oil, climate change challenges, and eroding economic competitiveness. Waiting to make real improvements only drives up future costs whereas responsible policies can improve transportation and reduce the national deficit today.

Enclosed is an explanation of our preliminary findings from the initiative with recommendations. In summary, we recommend that the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform:

END WASTEFUL SPENDING ON EXISTING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTS
Create in the next transportation reauthorization bill a Transportation Realignment and Accountability Commission. The commission could review all non-core surface transportation programs and recommend, based on performance against their original legislative justifications, whether they should be continued or terminated.

INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE TO GROW THE ECONOMY
Smart investments will grow the economy. Require all federal capital surface transportation investments, other than assistance for reconstruction and state of good repair programs, to be distributed on a competitive basis and subject to rigorous economic analysis. Funding should be predicated on projects meeting minimum benefit-cost requirements.

FULLY FUND A REFORMED FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM WITH NEW REVENUE SOURCES
Publicly-funded or financed transportation investment programs should add revenue to the general fund of the U.S. Treasury. We further recommend that this funding goal be achieved through pricing of carbon emissions from within the transportation sector, either through (1) increased gas taxes, (2) a sales tax (or other tax indexed to price and inflation) on gasoline, (3) emission-based user fees for access to capacity on the National Transportation System (NTS), or (4) a fee on oil consumption imposed at the well-head or the point of importation of oil or refined oil products.

We look forward to working with you on this important matter.

Sincerely,


The Honorable William W. Bradley

The Honorable Thomas J. Ridge

The Honorable David M. Walker

Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

  • Commentary
    A Second Trump Term: Will Southeast Asia Tilt Toward China?

    Tapping our network of China experts in the region, Carnegie China offers this latest “China Through a Southeast Asian Lens” report to offer preliminary assessments of whether the U.S. effort to reshape the global trading order will lead countries in the region to tilt toward Beijing. 

      • +6

      Selina Ho, Khin Khin Kyaw Kyee, Joseph Ching Velasco, …

  • Commentary
    Is China Willing to Influence Russia on the Ukraine War?

    Beijing is trying to navigate the overall situation regarding Ukraine, especially the substance of interactions between Washington and Moscow.

      • Ellen Nakashima
      • Zhao Long
      • +1

      Ellen Nakashima, Zhao Long, Pavlo Klimkin, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.