- +10
Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …
{
"authors": [
"Moisés Naím"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Climate Change",
"Security"
]
}Source: Getty
The Future: 10 Questions
Today’s emergencies should not distract policy makers from thinking about the long-term challenges that will define the world—for the better or the worse—in the coming century.
Source: El Pais

These are, then, 10 questions about the future, which I present in no particular order of importance, and, in several cases, are clearly linked.
1. Will we be able to limit the increase in global temperature to 3ºC, or will it rise a further 8ºC or more? If the increase reaches or passes 8ºC, the planet and its inhabitants will be facing unprecedented challenges.
2. Will there be 16 billion inhabitants or will there be just six billion of us living on planet Earth? This is the range of possibilities that the United Nations estimates with respect to the size of the global population in 2100, depending on fertility indices and other factors.
3. How many countries will have nuclear weapons by 2100? None? Twenty-five? This is the number of countries that experts reckon could have atomic bombs in the coming decades if they continue to develop their nuclear programs in this direction and if the rest of the world lets them. Today there are nine "nuclear weapons" countries.
4. What will be the model of government in the future: democracies as in Europe, the United States, India and Brazil, or authoritarian regimes such as those in China and Russia?
5. Will the rapid expansion of the middle class that we have seen over the last decade in the poorest and most-populated countries continue? Or will deep inequality be the norm?
6. Will Islam become the source of tension and conflict, or will it renovate, transforming itself into a force for peace and development?
7. Will the internet and cyberspace evolve as benign forces or will they be a source of new threats?
8. One of the characteristics of the 20th century was the creation of many new nations. Will state-failure be the defining characteristic of the 21st century?
9. Will globalization continue, driven by technologies that shorten distances and communication costs, and by public policies that encourage international integration? Or on the contrary, will social unrest produced by globalization feed nationalism and protectionism, blocking the movement of people, products, money, and ideas?
10. Will economic, political, military and social power be more or less concentrated?
It is obvious that this list of factors that will define the future is incomplete. Many are missing, and we can all think of other challenges we will face. But these 10 should probably be included on any list. At the very least they should serve to begin an indispensible conversation; one that is more urgent than we might like to think.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.
- The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 DaysResearch
- View From Latin AmericaCommentary
Moisés Naím
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Can China Turn Its Small Modular Reactor Ambitions into Commercial Reality?Article
China has showcased its engineering prowess with small modular reactor demonstration projects. But turning these technological achievements into commercial success will be a greater challenge.
Tong Zhao
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis
- Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its AlliesPaper
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma