Commentary
In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.
Damien Ma
{
"authors": [
"Hans Timmer",
"Uri Dadush"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Western Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Lessons for Policymakers
Policymakers must realize that the world has changed with the deep crisis in the advanced countries and everyone has to adapt to that.
Published on Dec 15, 2011
What lessons can policymakers take from the crisis?
One lesson is the realization that the world has changed with the deep crisis in the advanced countries and everyone has to adapt to that. These are the kind of crises that really reshape the world—the global economy will never be the same again. The economic relationships have changed. That was a gradual process, but the crisis really brings the point home and accelerates the transformation.
This change has consequences. Businesses and policymakers will need some time to adjust to this. In the coming years, the main question for leading companies in high-income countries will be how to compete with globalizing companies from emerging markets.
This change has consequences. Businesses and policymakers will need some time to adjust to this. In the coming years, the main question for leading companies in high-income countries will be how to compete with globalizing companies from emerging markets.
Read more
Emerging countries will need to find their voice and play a more assertive role. They have always been in the position to react to proposals, but they will increasingly need to come up with global solutions themselves.
There is still a reluctance to fully accept the fact that the world is bigger now and there are more seats needed at the table of global governance. It is healthy that emerging markets have increasing influence and global governing bodies should change to reflect this.
The second lesson is that there are enormous vulnerabilities in the integrated financial system and the world lacks the governing system to keep this under control. Ultimately this is an example where institutions are running far behind the actual economy. They need to catch up. We need better global governance and Europe is the perfect example.
Instead of pulling back and thinking that governments need to leave it to the markets, the solution is to fix the governance issues.
And finally, high-income countries are in envy of the success of emerging markets and they try to understand what makes them so successful. Part of that success is just that developing countries are catching up, but part of it is also that there is better focus on long-term strategies in emerging economies. This is something that is missing in high-income countries today.
We have confirmed that fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus are needed in times of crisis. By acting promptly and avoiding protectionism stimulus helped the world to avoid a depression a few years ago. But we have also learned that once you have the fiscal stimulus, withdrawing the fiscal stimulus is very hard.
Fiscal stimulus is meant to be timely, temporary, and targeted. This means it’s easier to have automatic stabilizers or enough safety nets built into the system. When the economy slows this kind of spending increases automatically, and when economic growth accelerates again there is a gradual withdrawal. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the United States—all of the decisions are held hostage to the politics of the day.
Finally, in my view the crisis has confirmed the importance of flexible exchange rates. The European crisis has shown that if countries are going to fix their exchange rates they need to do many other things to support the system. MORE►
————————
Hans Timmer is the director of the World Bank's development prospects group.
There is still a reluctance to fully accept the fact that the world is bigger now and there are more seats needed at the table of global governance. It is healthy that emerging markets have increasing influence and global governing bodies should change to reflect this.
The second lesson is that there are enormous vulnerabilities in the integrated financial system and the world lacks the governing system to keep this under control. Ultimately this is an example where institutions are running far behind the actual economy. They need to catch up. We need better global governance and Europe is the perfect example.
Instead of pulling back and thinking that governments need to leave it to the markets, the solution is to fix the governance issues.
And finally, high-income countries are in envy of the success of emerging markets and they try to understand what makes them so successful. Part of that success is just that developing countries are catching up, but part of it is also that there is better focus on long-term strategies in emerging economies. This is something that is missing in high-income countries today.
We have confirmed that fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus are needed in times of crisis. By acting promptly and avoiding protectionism stimulus helped the world to avoid a depression a few years ago. But we have also learned that once you have the fiscal stimulus, withdrawing the fiscal stimulus is very hard.
Fiscal stimulus is meant to be timely, temporary, and targeted. This means it’s easier to have automatic stabilizers or enough safety nets built into the system. When the economy slows this kind of spending increases automatically, and when economic growth accelerates again there is a gradual withdrawal. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the United States—all of the decisions are held hostage to the politics of the day.
Finally, in my view the crisis has confirmed the importance of flexible exchange rates. The European crisis has shown that if countries are going to fix their exchange rates they need to do many other things to support the system. MORE►
————————
Hans Timmer is the director of the World Bank's development prospects group.
About the Authors
Hans Timmer
Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic Future
- How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate PerformanceCommentary
Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.
Mathias Larsen
- What’s New about Involution?Commentary
“Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.
Michael Pettis
- The Chinese Investment Riddle: What Cities RevealCommentary
While China's investment story seems contradictory from the outside, the real answers to Beijing's high-quality growth ambitions are hiding in plain sight across the nation's cities.
Yuhan Zhang
- Using China’s Central Government Balance Sheet to “Clean up” Local Government Debt Is a Bad IdeaCommentary
China's stimulus addiction cannot go on forever. Beijing still has policy space to clean up the country's massive debt issue, but time is running short.
Michael Pettis
