• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Global Governance"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Being In Charge Ain’t What It Used to Be

Although the change in power dynamics has led to increased competition and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, it is also tied to the political gridlock taking place around the world.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 28, 2013

Source: Yahoo's Daily Ticker

Speaking on Yahoo's Daily Ticker, Carnegie's Moisés Naím discussed the fleeting nature of power. Chief executives in 30 of 34 democracies are dealing with a parliament controlled by the opposition, as landslide victories are becoming "endangered species." Political gridlock has been observed at home in Washington, D.C. with the sequester, as well as abroad with the outcome of the Italian elections. The trend is evidenced in corporations as well, asserted Naím. Although the financial sector continues to be powerful, the use and the capacity of their power are constrained.

Although this change in power dynamics seems beneficial and a shift to celebrate, there are risks, Naím continued. Aside from the increased competition, more intense scrutiny, and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, the downside is manifesting in the gridlock observed in politics. Gridlock is creating weaker democracies with governments incapable of delivering timely decisions effectively. This is in turn making decisions on a global level more difficult. Furthermore, the capacity for countries to work collaboratively to tackle issues is declining, explained Naím.

It would be too simple to say the Internet, media, and other IT revolutionary technologies are the driving forces, Naím added. These are simply tools that are being used by users. But these users are being driven, directed, and motivated by tertiary factors. These tectonic changes, as Naím described them, include changes in demographics as well as the international distribution of assets and activities. The forces behind the shift in power can be categorized as either the More revolution, the Mobility revolution, and the Mentality revolution.

This interview was originally broadcast on Yahoo's Daily Ticker.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
Political ReformEconomyGlobal GovernanceNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?

    China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.

      Michael Pettis

  • Xi walking into a room with people standing and applauding around him
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic Future

    In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

  • Overproduction in China
    Commentary
    What’s New about Involution?

    “Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    The Chinese Investment Riddle: What Cities Reveal

    While China's investment story seems contradictory from the outside, the real answers to Beijing's high-quality growth ambitions are hiding in plain sight across the nation's cities.

      Yuhan Zhang

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.