• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

How Will the Fed’s Rate Hike Affect Latin America?

The Federal Reserve’s rate hike is unlikely to be a cause of major disruption in Latin America this time around.

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush
Published on Jan 11, 2016

Source: Latin America Advisor

The U.S. Federal Reserve on Dec. 16 raised interest rates, ending what Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen called an “extraordinary seven-year period” during which policymakers kept the federal funds rate near zero in an effort to support the economy. How will the Fed’s action affect Latin American economies, many of which are struggling with anemic growth and low prices for their commodity exports? How will the interest rate hike affect Latin American countries’ ability to pay off their dollar denominated debt? Which nations are most at risk, and which countries in the region might see any benefit from the U.S. interest rate hike?

Uri Dadush, senior associate in the International Economics Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:

“The worry about the Fed’s first interest rate increase in seven years is understandable, given weak growth in Latin America and memories of previous instances of U.S. monetary tightening that triggered large capital flow reversals and regional balance of payments crises. The China-driven stock market rout which ushered in the new year adds to the fear. However, I believe that the Fed’s move is unlikely to be a cause of major disruption in Latin America this time around. U.S. policy interest rates are barely budging from zero against a background of a recovering U.S. and European economy, and interest rates are likely to remain at record lows among all the world’s reserve currencies over at least the next 12 months. Moreover, the Fed’s actions as well as words suggest that future interest rate hikes will be gradual and come pari passu with continued U.S. recovery. Firms and banks in Latin America that owe dollars and are not naturally or financially hedged will suffer from the higher dollar, but there are already large offsetting benefits from the high dollar in the form of stronger exports and remittance inflows. The message here is not that Latin America is out of the woods, only that if it is attacked by a bear, this time it’s not the Fed. China’s weakness, collapsing oil and other commodity prices, domestic struggles, precarious fiscal situations and inappropriate policies are the more fearsome predators now. Thinking about vulnerabilities, what is striking is the diversity of the continent, especially between the U.S.-linked North and the commodity- and China-linked South, and between those whose policies are supportive and those whose policies are in a mess, such as Brazil, Venezuela, Ecuador and Argentina, where change appears to be finally afoot.”

This interview originally appeared in Latin America Advisor.

About the Author

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Labors of Tsipras

      Uri Dadush

  • In The Media
    Greece, Complacency, and the Euro

      Uri Dadush

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
EconomyTradeNorth AmericaUnited StatesSouth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

  • Overproduction in China
    Commentary
    What’s New about Involution?

    “Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    The Chinese Investment Riddle: What Cities Reveal

    While China's investment story seems contradictory from the outside, the real answers to Beijing's high-quality growth ambitions are hiding in plain sight across the nation's cities.

      Yuhan Zhang

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.