Other
François Godement, Ashley J. Tellis
{
"authors": [
"François Godement"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
EU Anxiety About China Driven by Difference in Approach
There is a contradiction in China's separate efforts toward EU member states (and perhaps even more, the five pre-accession candidate states in the Balkans) and its extremely slow pace in reaching agreements with the EU as a whole
Published on Apr 8, 2019
Source: Global Times
Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Italy, Monaco and France came four months after a trip to Spain and Portugal. The 21st EU-China summit will take place on Tuesday, only nine months after the previous one. It would seem that China is placing much attention on Europe. Yet, there has rarely been as much frustration on the part of the EU regarding the state of relations with China, and this frustration comes through quite clearly in the Joint Communication that the European Commission and the European External Action Service, EU-China - A strategic outlook, addressed to the member states prior to their next council meeting, which will have relations with China on its agenda: no longer a developing economy, a systemic rival, and a strategic competitor over economic issues; China is being asked (if the EU Council agrees) to "deliver" on previous commitments.
Meanwhile, after Portugal, Italy signed an agreement on the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative, joining an earlier batch of Eastern European countries (including Bulgaria and Poland) that had also signed on prior to 2015. Collectively, the European member states present at last year's Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation held in Beijing had declined to sign a joint text with China, citing concern about the norms and standards of the project. French President Emmanuel Macron, who had endorsed the goals of the BRI in his speech in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province in January 2018, had nonetheless raised the issue of defining good rules in common.
There is a contradiction in China's separate efforts toward EU member states (and perhaps even more, the five pre-accession candidate states in the Balkans) and its extremely slow pace in reaching agreements with Europe - the EU - as a whole. This contradiction is easily perceived over the gap between the EU and the member states regarding the BRI.
About the Author
François Godement
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Godement, an expert on Chinese and East Asian strategic and international affairs, was a nonresident senior fellow in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Reorienting China Policy By Working With Europe
- China at the Gates: A New Power Audit of EU-China RelationsIn The Media
François Godement, Abigaël Vasselier
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis
- Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its AlliesPaper
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
