Trilateral Arms Control? Perspectives From Washington, Moscow, and Beijing

{
  "authors": [
    "Ulrich Kühn",
    "Alexey Arbatov",
    "David Santoro",
    "Tong Zhao"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Future of Arms Control"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}

Other

Trilateral Arms Control? Perspectives From Washington, Moscow, and Beijing

As the world enters an age of seemingly unconstrained great power competition, arms control between Russia, China, and the United States could help strengthen arms race and crisis stability and provide a platform for strategic dialogue.

By Ulrich Kühn, Alexey Arbatov, David Santoro, Tong Zhao

Published on Mar 19, 2020

Source: IFSH

With the end of the INF Treaty in 2019, trilateral arms control – meaning arms control between the United States, Russia, and China – has gained center stage. Only shortly after the U.S. withdrawal, U.S. President Trump declared that he wants a new nuclear pact to be signed by both Russia and China. Other U.S. administration officials have set the goal of including China in a future follow-on framework to the New START agreement, which expires in February 2021. However, could trilateral arms control be possible at all, and what would be necessary conditions?

In this IFSH Research Report, internationally renowned experts Alexey Arbatov (Russia), David Santoro (United States), and Tong Zhao (China) discuss what is possible and what is not. Edited by Ulrich Kühn (IFSH), the report includes a number of very specific proposals, including from China, on how to move forward on trilateral arms control.

Read Full Text

The full report was originally published by IFSH.

About the Authors

Ulrich Kühn

Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program

Ulrich Kühn is a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the head of the arms control and emerging technologies program at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.

Alexey Arbatov

Alexey Arbatov is the head of the Center for International Security at the Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

David Santoro

Tong Zhao

Senior Fellow with the Nuclear Policy Program and Carnegie China

Tong Zhao is a senior fellow with the Nuclear Policy Program and Carnegie China, Carnegie’s East Asia-based research center on contemporary China. Formerly based in Beijing, he now conducts research in Washington on strategic security issues.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

Commentary
To Reboot Arms Control, Start with Small Steps
There are three guiding principles that can help make future arms control dialogues more successful.
Andrey Baklitskiy, Alexandra Bell, Tong Zhao
Commentary
Practical Ways to Promote U.S.-China Arms Control Cooperation
The United States and China must cooperate on arms control. But to do so, the two countries need an innovative approach.
Tong Zhao
Commentary
The United States, China, and the Future of Arms Control
To better understand the prospects for U.S.-China arms control, The Diplomat’s senior editor, Ankit Panda, spoke to Tong Zhao, a senior fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, based at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in Beijing.
Tong Zhao
Commentary
Nuclear Powers Must Lead on Arms Control
The Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) are under-utilizing the P5 Process, endangering global efforts to promote disarmament through transparency and confidence-building measures. If reinvigorated, however, the Process has the potential to make greater contributions to arms control.
Tong Zhao
Commentary
Opportunities for Nuclear Arms Control Engagement With China
While China may not think it has an interest in participating in major-power arms control now, pressures are building for it to do so. If Washington wants to engage constructively with Beijing, it should focus on concrete proposals to manage competition.
Tong Zhao

More Work from Carnegie China

Commentary

To Reboot Arms Control, Start with Small Steps

There are three guiding principles that can help make future arms control dialogues more successful.

Andrey Baklitskiy, Alexandra Bell, Tong Zhao

Commentary

Practical Ways to Promote U.S.-China Arms Control Cooperation

The United States and China must cooperate on arms control. But to do so, the two countries need an innovative approach.

Tong Zhao

Commentary

The United States, China, and the Future of Arms Control

To better understand the prospects for U.S.-China arms control, The Diplomat’s senior editor, Ankit Panda, spoke to Tong Zhao, a senior fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, based at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in Beijing.

Tong Zhao

Commentary

Nuclear Powers Must Lead on Arms Control

The Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) are under-utilizing the P5 Process, endangering global efforts to promote disarmament through transparency and confidence-building measures. If reinvigorated, however, the Process has the potential to make greater contributions to arms control.

Tong Zhao

Commentary

Opportunities for Nuclear Arms Control Engagement With China

While China may not think it has an interest in participating in major-power arms control now, pressures are building for it to do so. If Washington wants to engage constructively with Beijing, it should focus on concrete proposals to manage competition.

Tong Zhao