This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace announced that Dmitri Trenin has been appointed director of the Carnegie Moscow Center.
MOSCOW, Dec 22—The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace today announced that Dmitri Trenin has been appointed director of the Carnegie Moscow Center.
Making the announcement, Jessica T. Mathews, president of the Endowment, said:
“I am extremely proud to announce that Dmitri Trenin will become the new director of the Carnegie Moscow Center. As the first Russian director of the Center, Dmitri brings both a wealth of experience as one of Russia’s leading experts on Eurasia and Russian security and foreign policy, as well as a strong understanding of the United States. This perfect combination of skills makes him an unbeatable choice at a time when relations between Russia and the United States urgently require attention.
“For fifteen years, our Moscow office has collaborated with our Russia Program in Washington D.C., to produce some of the most informed and innovative research and policy recommendations in the market. So successful has the Moscow office been that it served as the model for the Endowment’s New Vision, which has seen us add operations in China, the Middle East, and Europe. In the years ahead Dmitri will broaden our agenda beyond the still crucially important work on U.S.–Russia relations to look at areas of common interest between Russia and the other regions in which Carnegie is now located.”
Dmitri Trenin said:
“Since it was established in 1993, the Carnegie Moscow Center has served as a model of a modern think tank, actively promoting Russian-American and Russian-European exchanges and joint research, and functioning as a respected venue for serious Russian debate on important issues. These important objectives will remain at the forefront of our work.
“Carnegie’s New Vision—pioneering the first global think tank—challenges us to take a big step forward and think globally. Within an expanded Carnegie family, the Moscow Center will also work to connect important voices from Russia, the new Eastern Europe and the Baltics, and the Caucasus and Central Asia, to the rest of the world and to bring expert views from around the world to Russia.
As the eighth director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, I am proud to lead an excellent team of senior scholars, among the best in their class, and to welcome Sam Greene as deputy director for operations, with a range of very important responsibilities. For three years Rose Gottemoeller took the Moscow Center to new heights and will be an exceedingly hard act to follow, but Sam and I will try as best we can.”
Rose Gottemoeller, who served as the director of the Moscow Center from January 2006 – December 2008, will return to the Endowment’s Washington D.C., office as a senior associate to continue work on U.S.–Russia relations and nuclear security and stability. Formerly deputy undersecretary for defense nuclear nonproliferation in the U.S. Department of Energy, she has been with the Endowment since 2000.
###
NOTES
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai