• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Thomas de Waal"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Europe

An East-West Gay Rights Divide

Not only in Russia where ideologists use the issue of homosexual rights as a dividing line between the East and the West, but in some other post-communist states as well the European agenda on gay and lesbian rights is not shared by the majority of population.

Link Copied
By Thomas de Waal
Published on Dec 18, 2013

Not free trade, not democracy. Who could have guessed that the big ideological dividing line Russian ideologists are drawing between East and West would be homosexuality?

New words have entered the Russian political lexicon. Pro-western opposition leaders are described as “liberasti,” a combination of the words “liberal” and “pederast.” And anti-EU activists are claiming that the Euromaidan is actually a “Euro-Sodom.”

The marginal fringe of this group portrays Europe as a scary place where the state abducts your children and no longer permits usage of the words “mommy” and “daddy.”

The mainstream, led by the new-old media-darling of Russian patriotic television, Dmitry Kiselev, is more sarcastic. Kiselev publicly mocked the (openly gay) German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, saying that when he met the opposition brothers, boxers Vitali and Wladimir Klitschko, in Kiev, he was “heated and maybe overheated by the bodies of the heavyweights.”

The divide is genuine. A recent article by Michael Lipka of the Pew Research Center presents a map of attitudes to gay rights that runs more or less down the line of the old Iron Curtain (although Greece and the Czech Republic fall on the other side).

Citing a Pew survey from 2010, Lipka records responses across Europe to the statement, “Gay men and lesbians should be free to live their own lives as they wish.” West European countries, headed by the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark, are at the top of the list, with 89 percent or more of respondents approving the statement.

Down at the bottom are Ukraine and Russia, with only 28 and 25 percent respectively respecting gay rights.

Westerners who fight for gay rights should take this seriously. While not giving up the struggle, they should reflect that you will not make much progress if in these countries (or in parts of Alabama or Oklahoma for that matter) you just use the same discourse that you use at home.

Two other findings from the same poll give more food for thought. One is that the traditionally Catholic Spain has undergone a massive generational change—80 percent of Spaniards approved that statement. The second is that the third lowest response, on a par with Ukraine, was in another traditionally Catholic country, Lithuania.

Lithuania however, is a member of the European Union and NATO. It can be assumed that many Ukrainians will also “choose Europe” without fully sharing the European agenda on gay and lesbian rights.

About the Author

Thomas de Waal

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

      Thomas de Waal

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity
      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal
Political ReformDemocracyForeign PolicyCivil SocietyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern Europe

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTA

    The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead

      Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki

  • India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 Era
    Research
    India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 Era

    Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.

      • Sameer Lalwani
      • +6

      Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.