• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Europe",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe",
    "Germany",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Europe Is Completely Divided Over How to Respond to Russia

Europe is divided over how to respond to Russia’s invasion of Crimea. The most powerful figure in the diplomatic tango is Germany’s Angela Merkel.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Mar 4, 2014

Source: Public Radio International

Europe is scrambling to defuse the crisis over Russia’s incursion into the Crimean region of Ukraine. And the most powerful figure in the diplomatic tango is Germany’s Angela Merkel.

Merkel speaks Russian, grew up in the former Communist East Germany and leads the most powerful country in Europe. But so far, she has not been able to lead European leaders to a single point of view. Nor is there a unified view even in her own country.

“Berlin is quite divided about this,” says Judy Dempsey of Carnegie Europe. “[Merkel] knows Vladimir Putin. She knows his KGB past. She has a very difficult relationship with him and she knows exactly what’s at stake.”

But Dempsey says the German Foreign Ministry is controlled by the Social Democrats. “They’re very much this old-fashioned, ostpolitik, with a ‘keep talking, move slowly, don’t alienate Russia’ approach to dealing with Moscow.” So Dempsey says it will be up to Merkel to decide how tough Germany will be with Russia. “And what Merkel decides will influence the overall EU attitude.”

The divisions within Europe over how to respond to the crisis mirror the divisions within Germany. Dempsey finds this astonishing given the potential for instability.

“There are experts, including Russian experts, who believe that Putin won’t stop just at Crimea, that he might just go a step further, toward Odessa.” Dempsey says the implications for neighboring Moldova would be huge — and Merkel knows this.

“She has to decide which way she’s going to jump and, once she jumps, she’ll have to bring in the other EU member states behind her.” But Dempsey says that won’t be easy.

“At the moment they’re just so divided. They can’t agree on the sanctions. They can’t agree on the policies. They can’t agree how tough they should be. They have no hard power. This is all about soft power and they can’t even agree how to use soft power.”

Sweden wants tough sanctions against Russia. So does Poland. The Baltic states want much tougher action against Russia.

“Italy is saying, ‘Oh well, another crisis. We can’t corner Putin,’” Dempsey says. Britain hasn’t gotten tough yet, but she thinks Prime Minister David Cameron might move in that direction, with a caveat.

“Britain may come around to being much tougher, but remember, if Britain agrees to sanctions on assets, well, you know where most of Russia’s assets are at the moment? They’re in London,” she explains.

France, Dempsey says, is slightly ambiguous. “They’re willing to give diplomacy a chance. If push comes to shove, I think President Hollande will go for sanctions, depending on what they are and whether anyone can agree on sanctions.”

Part of Germany’s influence with Moscow is that it is Russia’s most important trading partner, mostly in oil and energy. And there are more than 5,000 German companies with operations in Russia. Dempsey doesn’t believe Putin will stop German companies from operating or void their contracts because Russia needs German know-how and technology.

“If he restricted German businesses in Russia, he would lose an awful lot and, at the end of the day, the Russian economy would suffer.”

Dempsey believes the Russian economy is the key to ending the crisis. “Yesterday and today, the stock markets in Russia plummeted to the lowest in five years. $12 billion have been wiped off Gasprom, Russia’s state energy monopoly, which is Putin’s political and economic instrument.”

She says Russia’s central bank is trying to prop up the ruble and she thinks capital flight from foreign investors will probably be accelerated because of the crisis in Crimea. “This isn’t going to be a short crisis,” says Dempsey, who added that the same things happened during the 2008 crisis when Russia invaded Georgia.

“This is different. This is big time. This is Ukraine. If this is sustained, this sort of chiseling into stock markets and into Russian capital and foreign direct investment, it will really affect Putin because [what] he has relied on for so long is oil and gas.”

Dempsey says German officials have long encouraged Putin to diversify his economy, to no avail. “At the moment, I think this is a big weakness for him.”

This interview was originally aired on Public Radio International.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Germany’s Shattered Consensus

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyRussiaEuropeEastern EuropeUkraineWestern EuropeGermanyIran

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Paper
    Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with China

    After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    India’s Semiconductor Ecosystem Is Maturing—and ASML Is Taking Notice

    The ASML MoU with Tata Electronics is an indicator of how far the Indian semiconductor ecosystem has come. This ecosystem has been years in the making and represents real commercial logic.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTA

    The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead

      Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.