For Russia, But Against Each Other

Indeed, President Putin has quite a sizable fan club in Europe that extends beyond the fringes. Just read the comments relating to any article on Russia in any European newspaper. And despite our pledged commitment to traditional values, which Europeans have compromised, the members of the club are roughly evenly split between the right and the left. In her many interviews, the head of the French National Front, Marine Le Pen, talks about restoring a sense of pride to a great nation, while the Marxist-leaning Greek Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, calls for lifting the anti-Russian sanctions and tackling the problem of rising fascism in Ukraine.

Since our traditional values are also comprised of both right- and left-wing legacies, and we are now against revolutions but for the Soviet Union, we can find common ground with both camps. Our ideologists would probably want to organize a parade of all our supporters, but we can’t get all of them together: our left-wing Greek friend Syriza is fighting tooth and nail with the Golden Dawn Party, our right-wing Greek friend. In fact, the Golden Dawn parliament members are now on trial for the murder of a left-wing activist. So, the extreme right and the extreme left won’t sit at the same table.

We would have a hard time sitting alongside the European left as well. True, they oppose the United States and its Ukrainian puppets—eight Spaniards were just arrested back home for fighting under the red banner for the Donetsk People’s Republic. They came all the way to Donbas to give the coal mines back to the miners, which conjures up the images of the Soviet Union assisting the Spanish Republicans during the Spanish civil war in the 1930s. But the same groups from the European left support same-sex marriage and modern art that has been known to offend our sensibilities.

Therefore, the unreliable left was put on the backburner in favor of the right, but the right let us down too. It is hard to call this gathering the right-wing international, though. It wasn’t cobbled together on the basis of its members’ right-wing views; the only criterion for joining was the support for Russia’s recent initiatives–—from its struggle for the one and only proper sexual orientation to the independence of Donbas. Were it not for this criterion, the forum could have attracted the Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, and Ukrainian extreme right, but they were nowhere to be found.

It wasn’t quite clear what is to come out of this gathering; therefore, it was decided that the Rodina (Motherland) party, which is not even represented in the parliament, would sponsor it. Rodina would then take the fall in case things don’t work out. Of course, not every political party that has no representation in the parliament would have sufficient funds to host a conference in the Holiday Inn; nor would any political party be allowed to organize an international forum. St. Petersburg authorities disrupted a modest lecture by a political analyst, Stanislav Belkovsky, around the same time. It is also hard to imagine that this is a completely independent initiative in light of the fact that the Rodina party called itself “the president’s special force” during the 2013 regional elections, and its head, Alexei Zhuravlev, who was elected leader of the revamped Rodina, remained a member of the United Russia faction in the Duma.

A Recipe for Failure

The outcome was quite depressing, though. No matter how much they wanted to organize a parade of the European pro-Russian conservative forces, they have failed to do so. They got the participants together, but the forum failed miserably.

One of the reasons behind the failure is that many among the European right can’t stand Putin, and many of these people also can’t stand one another. For instance, Farage of the United Kingdom Independence Party doesn’t like Le Pen, and she answers in kind. It is understandable that the nationalist international doesn’t work that well in general, since its goal is separation, not unity. What unites the nationalists, however, is the awareness of their historic mission. These are not the people who want to win the election, fulfill their election promises, and quietly hand the power over to their successors. The stakes are higher here. They believe Europe is on the wrong track, and they have to set it straight. This messianic zeal brings them closer to Putin and raises their self-esteem quite high. But it doesn’t elevate their status in the diplomatic protocol.

The right-wing international could get together anywhere in Europe, but they had to be invited by someone of a higher rank than the stooges from the Rodina party. Respectable arch-conservatives could have responded to Putin’s personal invitation or an invitation sent by someone from his close circle. After all, some of them see themselves as his associates in helping to bring about the conservative tide in Europe.

However, it’s beneath Putin as a head of a great power to call the leaders of opposition movements. He can do that once they win. But when the host of the party invites his guests over, he shouldn’t send his friends and associates invitations through his porter. Only those who don’t care would answer the porter’s call—or in this case, the call of a party that is not even represented in the federal parliament. Take Roberto Fiore, for instance. The Italian politician, who openly praises fascism, was patiently listening to how the speakers at the St. Petersburg forum curse Ukraine’s fascist junta, just after returning from Kiev, where he went to build bridges with his Ukrainian counterpart, Svoboda.

The European far right also has tiers. Some of its adherents have long been participating in elections; they are represented in parliaments and occasionally join coalition governments. If the organizers had played their cards right, a more decent sampling of the European right could have come to St. Petersburg: Marine Le Pen’s National Front, the Flemish Block, the Austrian Freedom party, and maybe even the Swedish democrats or the Norwegians from the Progress party.

The low-level invitation was not the only reason why the representatives of these movements didn’t visit St. Petersburg. They were increasingly less likely to appear in Russia’s second capital as more and more fringe groups put their names on the guest list. The German National Democratic Party, the Greek Golden Dawn, the Italian New Force, the British National Party, or Nathan Smith of the Texas independence movement are not the groups or individuals that the more mainstream conservative organizations want to associate themselves with. The same goes for the Russian participants: Marine Le Pen would visit the Russian leaders, but not the leaders of the Russian Imperial Movement. The guest list and their appearance scared the obedient Russian politicians so much that even the Rodina head himself didn’t show up at the conference.

While the organizers have real supporters and sympathizers in Europe, they failed to present them in St. Petersburg. Apparently, it is not enough to have a vague idea that one has allies; one should also know who they are and how to invite them properly. However, the state created the atmosphere in which not only opposite political views, but also the mere knowledge of how the outside world really works, presents a problem and obstructs one’s political career; it therefore should come as no surprise that those entrusted with rallying Russia’s friends will inevitably attract friends of the same ilk.

This publication originally appeared in Russian.