• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Richard Youngs"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Transatlantic Cooperation",
    "Civic Activism"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "Russia",
    "Europe",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

The “Age of Rage” versus the “Age of Surveillance”

Does the recent surge of citizen activism and anger, which is just the most recent swell in what has been a decade-long tide of large-scale protests, offer some broader lessons about the state of democracy?

Link Copied
By Richard Youngs
Published on Feb 26, 2019

Source: World Politics Review

It seems that everywhere you look today, people are taking to the streets. Recent mass protests have exploded in a dizzyingly diverse range of countries, including France, Hungary, Romania, Zimbabwe, Thailand, Sudan, Venezuela, Greece, as well as Gaza, and most recently Algeria. Does this surge of citizen activism and anger, which is just the most recent swell in what has been a decade-long tide of large-scale protests, offer some broader lessons about the state of democracy?

Some protests may look like a sign of democratic decay amid a rise of populism and alienation with the political status quo—for example, in Brazil, the United States or France. Others may look like a futile rattling of the political cage under growing illiberalism and authoritarianism, such as in Hungary, Morocco or Thailand. More optimistically, protests in places like Algeria, Venezuela and Sudan may signal a heartening indicator of the persistent aspiration for democracy and peoples’ willingness to fight for it in very different parts of the world.

Understanding the impact of these protests first requires dispelling several misconceptions that have accumulated about street politics over the past decade. A common view is that protests, though loud and disruptive, achieve little. But while many demonstrations fail dismally—consider attempts to overturn repressive regimes in Russia, China or Egypt—others achieve even beyond their initial aims. In just the past few years, popular movements have had a hand in throwing out governments in Armenia, Brazil, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guatemala, South Korea, Peru, Tunisia and Ukraine. Until recently, Venezuela belonged in the group of countries where protests failed against an entrenched regime, but now it may be on the cusp of moving into the category of more effective cases.

Read Full Text

This article was originally published by World Politics Review.

About the Author

Richard Youngs

Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program

Richard Youngs is a senior fellow in the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, based at Carnegie Europe. He works on EU foreign policy and on issues of international democracy.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    European Democracy Support Annual Review 2025
      • Elena-Viudes-Egea
      • +6

      Richard Youngs, ed., Elena Viudes Egea, Zselyke Csaky, …

  • Article
    The EU’s Dead-on-Arrival Pact for the Mediterranean

      Richard Youngs

Richard Youngs
Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Richard Youngs
DemocracyAsiaRussiaEuropeNorth America

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    Can Geopolitical Alignment Seal the India-EU FTA?

    This article argues that the geopolitical circumstances have never been more conducive, not merely for the early conclusion of the free trade agreement (FTA) between India and the EU, but also for crafting a substantive and comprehensive strategic partnership.

      Mohan Kumar

  • Source: iStock
    Commentary
    What’s Next for U.S. AI Policy?

    This commentary explores the likely actions of the Trump administration and driving forces on issues of deregulation, the United States’ leadership in AI, national security, and global engagements on AI safety.

      Shatakratu Sahu, Amlan Mohanty

  • Article
    One Year of the INDUS-X: Defense Innovation Between India and the U.S.

    Since its launch nearly a year ago, the INDUS-X has marked many milestones in the India-U.S. relationship. Much has been achieved, but there is room to further enhance defense cooperation between the two countries in the coming years.

      Ajay Kumar, Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Article
    What is the United States-India Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET)?

    This article explicates what iCET is and what it should not be mistaken for. The initiative is not designed to deliver a single deal. Instead, it involves multiple streams for cooperation and collaboration between the United States and India on critical and emerging technologies.

      Rudra Chaudhuri

  • Article
    Biotechnology Collaboration Through the iCET: A New Beginning

    Based on preliminary research and stakeholder discussions, this article features four areas of biosafety and biosecurity that could potentially become concrete agenda items for collaboration between the United States and India under the iCET.

      Shruti Sharma

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.