• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Aaron David Miller"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Palestine",
    "Levant"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Mourning Saeb Erekat: The Indefatigable, Media Savvy Palestinian Peace Negotiator Who Rejected Violence

Saeb was a unique figure among Palestinian officials and negotiators with whom we dealt.

Link Copied
By Aaron David Miller
Published on Nov 11, 2020

Source: Haaretz

Together, we mourn the passing of Saeb Erekat and extend our heartfelt condolences to his wife Niemeh and his four children Salam, Dalal, Ali and Muhammed.

They should be proud of who he was and what he accomplished in his life, through his decades of dedicated involvement in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, even though he would not live to see his greatest hope realized – a two state solution in which an independent Palestinian state would live in peace beside a secure Israel.

Saeb was a unique figure among Palestinian officials and negotiators with whom we dealt. With degrees from U.S. and UK universities, and teaching experience at the West Bank’s An-Najah University, he lacked the PLO diaspora credentials, the political standing, and the street cred of Israeli prison time of many of his colleagues in the Palestinian national movement.

Indeed, those colleagues often joked at his expense that he was “Mr. CNN” because of his fondness for the media and his passionate presentations before the cameras.

And yet, from the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference onward, he would be involved in almost every negotiating effort between Israelis and Palestinians.

Saeb’s influence flowed from different sources. Both Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas needed a negotiator who could relate to both the Israelis and the Americans as well as the international community and the media; his command of English and his capacity to analyze and draft texts became essential once the negotiations reached that stage.

No one else on the Palestinian side could play that role. His diligence was remarkable, and he became the most reliable repository of the negotiating record. Sometimes to a fault.

We had our differences because at times he could be inflexible. But then, without an independent base of his own and subject to Arafat’s whims, Saeb had little flexibility to depart from core Palestinian positions, and we often suspected, his bosses did not want him to do so.

The other reality is that no other Palestinian negotiator was as committed and indefatigable as Saeb in pursuit of a two state solution to be achieved through peaceful means.

Saeb genuinely believed – even well past the time when many of us had given up hope – that a conflict-ending solution was possible, no matter how bleak the moment. As he confronted his own mortality during his lung transplant in 2018, he told some of us that what kept him alive was his determination to achieve peace.

This was no talking point. This man deeply believed in dialogue and reconciliation with Israelis, eschewed violence, and lived his life accordingly. He sent his children to Seeds of Peace, a program that fosters coexistence and dialogue, sat on its Advisory Board and spoke on behalf of the organization and Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation whenever and wherever he could.

We mark Saeb’s passing knowing full well that prospects for an enduring peace between Israelis and Palestinians seem now like a distant dream. Having worked on this issue for years, we have no illusions, and neither did Saeb. But he never abandoned hope that with leadership, courage and determination peace remained possible.

Saeb Erekat never gave up hope, and to honor him, neither should we. May his memory and good works always be a blessing.

This article was originally published by Haaretz.

About the Author

Aaron David Miller

Senior Fellow, American Statecraft Program

Aaron David Miller is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, focusing on U.S. foreign policy.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    “It’s Not Like Turning a Switch On and Off”

      Helima Croft, Aaron David Miller

  • Commentary
    The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran

      Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller

Aaron David Miller
Senior Fellow, American Statecraft Program
Aaron David Miller
Political ReformForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastPalestineLevant

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

    India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.