• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

Estimates of North Korea’s Possible Nuclear Stockpile

North Korea’s state controlled media claimed on May 11 the country had completed removal of 8,000 fuel rods from its 5 megawatt plutonium production reactor at Yongbyon. Estimates by the Institute for Science and International Security suggest the fuel elements contain between 12 and 19 kilograms of plutonium. These fuel elements will have to cool for an unknown period of time in the fuel storage pond located next to the reactor building. It is estimated that within 2-3 months, the fuel could be processed and the weapon-usable plutonium made ready for production of nuclear weapons. There is no conclusive evidence that North Korea possesses any nuclear weapons, but U.S. officials assume they have produced an unknown number of nuclear devices. (Read More)

Link Copied
By Jon Wolfsthal
Published on May 11, 2005

North Korea’s state controlled media claimed on May 11 the country had completed removal of 8,000 fuel rods from its 5 megawatt plutonium production reactor at Yongbyon. Estimates by the Institute for Science and International Security suggest the fuel elements contain between 12 and 19 kilograms of plutonium. These fuel elements will have to cool for an unknown period of time in the fuel storage pond located next to the reactor building. It is estimated that within 2-3 months, the fuel could be processed and the weapon-usable plutonium made ready for production of nuclear weapons. There is no conclusive evidence that North Korea possesses any nuclear weapons, but U.S. officials assume they have produced an unknown number of nuclear devices.

The chart below provides a summary of North Korea’s estimated plutonium holdings. The three sections of the chart refer to the three distinct times North Korea is thought to have produced and recovered plutonium from the reactor at Yongbyon. It is not known how many kilograms of plutonium North Korea would require for each nuclear weapon (different designs require different amounts of material). The U.S. Department of Energy has revealed that a nuclear weapon can be produced with as little as four kilograms of plutonium. The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates that 8 kilograms are required to produce a nuclear device. We assume that North Korean weapons, if they indeed exist, require at least 5 kilograms of plutonium, yielding a possible North Korean capability of 8-11 weapons.

Year

Amount of Plutonium

4 kg of plutonium per weapon Estimate

5 kg of plutonium per weapon Estimate

8 kg of plutonium per weapon Estimate

1989

6-8 kg

2

1

1

2002-20031

25-30kg

7

5-6

3

2005

12-19kg

3-4

2-3

1-2

Total2

43-57kg

14

8-11

5-7


1. This material was produced between 1989 and 1993, but the fuel was under inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency until the collapse of the US-DPRK Agreed Framework in December 2002.

2. Columns do not total exactly, as excess material from one load of fuel may have been applied to future weapons production.

About the Author

Jon Wolfsthal

Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program

Jon Wolfsthal was a nonresident scholar with the Nuclear Policy Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Universal Compliance: A Strategy for Nuclear Security<br>With 2007 Report Card on Progress
      • +2

      George Perkovich, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Joseph Cirincione, …

  • Article
    10 Plus 10 Doesn’t Add Up

      Jon Wolfsthal

Jon Wolfsthal
Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program
Jon Wolfsthal
South KoreaNuclear Energy

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    Raja Mandala: India and the Korean Dream

    New Delhi and Seoul should focus on building flexible middle power coalitions in Asia to limit the impact of the current volatility in the relations between the United States and China.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Book
    Strategic Asia 2016-17: Understanding Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific

    This book examines how the region’s major political powers view international politics and the use of military force.

      Ashley J. Tellis, Alison Szalwinski, Michael Wills

  • Commentary
    Strategic Culture, National Security, and Policymaking in the Asia-Pacific

    Material factors can explain why certain outcomes occurred the way they did, and strategic culture can explain how countries thought about their circumstances, their choices, and their decisions.

      Ashley J. Tellis

  • Commentary
    The Great Game Folio: Peripheral Diplomacy

    Although geography limits New Delhi’s role in East Asia, Modi is betting India can win friends and partners through active engagement.

      C. Raja Mohan

  • Commentary
    Don't Blame It on China

    Unless Delhi brings greater clarity to the interpretation of the nuclear liability act and the regulations for its implementation, India's hopes of building an advanced nuclear power industry at home and exporting nuclear reactors and services around the world will come to naught.

      C. Raja Mohan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.