Commentary
Experts weigh in on whether the United States is too hostile toward China.
Stephen Wertheim, Evan S. Medeiros, Vijay Gokhale
Source: Getty
Article
At Last, Iraqi Lawmakers Agree on the 2010 Election Law
On December 6, 2009, the Iraqi parliament finally passed an election law for the 2010 elections. The law deals with the most controversial issues regarding the election.
Published on Dec 14, 2009
On Sunday, December 6, 2009, the Iraqi parliament finally passed an election law for the 2010 elections. The Presidency Council swiftly approved the measure, the result of sensitive negotiations among Iraq’s top legislators.
The most controversial issues were the distribution of parliamentary seats among provinces, and the number and distribution of minority and compensatory seats, which are apportioned to parties too small to win election in any single province, but that win a large enough share of the national vote to earn a seat in parliament.
- The 325-seat parliament will consist of 310 seats for the provinces, eight seats for minority groups, and seven compensatory seats.
- Provincial seats will be distributed on the basis of the 2005 Ministry of Trade’s population numbers (based on food ration cards), with 2.8% population growth added for all provinces.
- Iraqis living abroad will vote for representatives of their home provinces, with no special status attributed to them.
- Minority seats will be distributed as follows: five Christian seats will be contested within a single national district reserved for Christians. In addition, Yazidis will have one reserved seat in Nineveh, Saibis one in Baghdad, and Shabakis one in Nineveh.
- The seven remaining compensatory seats will be distributed among parties that fare well on the national level but do not gain any seats on the provincial level
| Province | 2005 Elections | 2010 Elections |
|---|---|---|
| Baghdad | 59 | 68 |
| Nineveh | 19 | 31 |
| Basra | 16 | 24 |
| Dhi Qar | 12 | 18 |
| Babil | 11 | 16 |
| Sulaymaniya | 15 | 17 |
| Anbar | 9 | 14 |
| Irbil | 13 | 14 |
| Diyala | 10 | 13 |
| Kirkuk | 9 | 12 |
| Salahaddin | 8 | 12 |
| Najaf | 8 | 12 |
| Wasit | 8 | 11 |
| Qadisiyah | 8 | 11 |
| Maysan | 7 | 10 |
| Dohuk | 7 | 10 |
| Karbala | 6 | 10 |
| Muthanna | 5 | 7 |
| Compensatory Seats | 45 | 15 |
| Total | 275 | 325 |
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Is U.S. Foreign Policy Too Hostile to China?
- India’s Sustained Economic Recovery Will Require Changes to Its Bankruptcy LawPaper
As India’s economy recovers from the coronavirus pandemic, Indian businesses need efficient financial structures to regain their ground. Key reforms to India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code could fill these gaps.
Anirudh Burman
- Cross-Border Data Access for Law Enforcement: What Are India’s Strategic Options?Paper
Access to cross-border data is an integral piece of the law enforcement puzzle. India is well placed to lead the discussions on international data agreements subject to undertaking necessary surveillance reforms.
Smriti Parsheera, Prateek Jha
- The BRI in Post-Coronavirus South AsiaArticle
After the coronavirus pandemic wanes, how will China’s reorientation of the Belt and Road Initiative to address global health concerns influence its relationships with South Asian countries?
Deep Pal, Rahul Bhatia
- India’s Unheeded Coronavirus WarningCommentary
Early in the outbreak, government researchers forecast several high-risk scenarios that were downplayed or ignored in public messaging.
Gautam I. Menon
