Prince of Our Disorder

{
  "authors": [
    "John Polcari"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Diwan",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Lebanon",
    "Saudi Arabia",
    "Gulf",
    "Levant"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Commentary

Diwan

Prince of Our Disorder

What do the arrest of Saudi princes and the resignation of Lebanon’s prime minister tell us about power plays in Riyadh?

By John Polcari

Published on Nov 8, 2017

In recent days, dramatic events have taken place in the Middle East. In Saudi Arabia, reports emerged that several senior princes had been placed under arrest, apparently at the orders of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, for their alleged involvement in corruption. Most analysts, however, saw this as a power play by the prince, as he prepares to inherit the throne from his father King Salman. At the same time, on November 4, Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri resigned, in what was widely regarded as a decision imposed on him by his Saudi patrons. Indeed, the resignation announcement took place in Riyadh.

It is to discuss these developments that Diwan spoke to Joseph Bahout, a visiting scholar in the Carnegie Middle East program. He recently wrote an article for Diwan in which he predicted that the implicit Saudi-Iranian understanding to sideline Lebanon from their rivalry was likely coming to an end. The Hariri resignation appeared to be confirmation of this.

About the Author

John Polcari

Former Program Coordinator and Research Assistant, Middle East Program

Political Reform Middle East Lebanon Saudi Arabia Gulf Levant

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Diwan

Commentary
Diwan
An Extension Under Fire
The decision of Lebanon’s parliament may look exceptional, but in reality it is not.
Issam Kayssi
Commentary
Diwan
Shockwaves Across the Gulf
The countries in the region are managing the fallout from Iranian strikes in a paradoxical way.
Angie Omar
Commentary
Diwan
The U.S. Risks Much, but Gains Little, with Iran
In an interview, Hassan Mneimneh discusses the ongoing conflict and the myriad miscalculations characterizing it.
Michael Young
Commentary
Diwan
The Greatest Dangers May Lie Ahead
In an interview, Nicole Grajewski discusses the military dimension of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran.
Michael Young
Commentary
Diwan
Firepower Against Willpower
In an interview, Naysan Rafati assesses the first week that followed the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran.
Michael Young

More Work from Diwan

Commentary

Diwan

An Extension Under Fire

The decision of Lebanon’s parliament may look exceptional, but in reality it is not.

Issam Kayssi

Commentary

Diwan

Shockwaves Across the Gulf

The countries in the region are managing the fallout from Iranian strikes in a paradoxical way.

Angie Omar

Commentary

Diwan

The U.S. Risks Much, but Gains Little, with Iran

In an interview, Hassan Mneimneh discusses the ongoing conflict and the myriad miscalculations characterizing it.

Michael Young

Commentary

Diwan

The Greatest Dangers May Lie Ahead

In an interview, Nicole Grajewski discusses the military dimension of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran.

Michael Young

Commentary

Diwan

Firepower Against Willpower

In an interview, Naysan Rafati assesses the first week that followed the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran.

Michael Young