Q&A
Suzanne Maloney, Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour
{
"authors": [
"Karim Sadjadpour"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Navigating Through Iran’s Charm Offensive
Though the diplomatic thaw between Iran and the West is a significant step forward, it remains to be seen whether Iran wants a rapprochement with the United States and will fundamentally change its foreign and domestic policy.
Published on Nov 4, 2013
Source: Agenda with Steve Paikin
The diplomatic thaw between Iran and the West is a significant step forward after years of tensions. As Carnegie’s Karim Sadjadpour explains, the question, however, is whether Iran wants a rapprochement with the United States and if Tehran will fundamentally change its foreign and domestic policy. Speaking to the Agenda with Steve Paikin, Sadjadpour argued that Iranian president Hassan Rouhani is a pragmatic politician and the team around him has a much more sophisticated world view than Ahmadinejad’s. They recognize that in order for Iran to fulfill its true potential and improve the state of the domestic economy, it can’t have an adversarial policy towards the outside world.
Sadjadpour explained that one of the fundamental challenges facing the Iranian regime is reconciling their state ideology, which has been based on resistance against America and a rejection of Israel’s existence. He contended that it will be very difficult for the regime to dilute those pillars which have been fundamental sources of identity for the system. Sadjadpour described the likelihood of Iran entirely giving up its nuclear program as slim to none and underlined that the big question is whether there is a middle ground between the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Leader, where Iran would make significant nuclear compromises in exchange for sanctions relief.
About the Author
Karim Sadjadpour
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
- Iran Wanted to Survive the War. Now What?
- What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for NowQ&A
Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- In the Trump Gaza Plan, Diplomatic Failure is SuccessCommentary
By failing to address Palestinian representation, the current process is bound to lead to just another temporary arrangement.
Nathan J. Brown
- From Hormuz to the Maghreb: The Geopolitical Reach of a Gulf CrisisArticle
Morocco and Algeria, each in its own way, are having to navigate the global economic fallout of the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.
Yasmine Zarhloule
- Kurdish Rebel Groups Are Wary of Tehran’s Next MoveCommentary
Following its deal with the United States, Iran may act against Iraq-based dissidents.
Wladimir van Wilgenburg
- The West’s Climate Colonialism in the Greater Middle EastCommentary
There is a disturbing structural parallel between the old global energy economy and the new green transition.
Angie Omar
- New Syria, Old Lebanon: Absence of the StateCommentary
Any move by the United States to make good on Trump’s suggestion that Washington persuade Damascus to confront Hezbollah militarily would have catastrophic consequences.
Kheder Khaddour
