Commentary
James M. Acton
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation",
"U.S. Nuclear Policy"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Nuclear Policy",
"Arms Control"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Can Iran Sell a Nuclear Deal Domestically?
The big unknown at this point in the negotiations is how much Iran is willing to concede in its enrichment program in order to get sanctions relief. While Iran wishes to remove all sanctions immediately, the United States and its allies would like to see the sanctions removed gradually.
Published on Mar 2, 2015
Source: Bloomberg News
Carnegie’s James Acton discussed Iran’s nuclear talks and trade sanctions on Bloomberg News’ Bottom Line. Acton told Bloomberg News that the big unknown at this point is how much Iran is willing to concede in its enrichment program in order to get sanctions relief. While Iran wishes to remove all sanctions immediately, the United States and its allies would like to see the sanctions removed gradually.
“There are stories coming out of the negotiations that the number of centrifuges that Iran would be permitted to operate has been agreed,” Acton said. “It’s also been reported that one of the big undecideds is the pace at which Iran demands sanctions relief," he added.
Another component to the negotiations is that many members of Congress, along with Israel, do not trust the Iranians. “Trust but verify is exactly the policy that the Obama administration is adopting for this negotiation,” Acton told Bloomberg News. “In major parts of any agreement—should one be reached—would be intrusive inspections on Iran’s program that go above and beyond additional standards,” he added.
“The Obama administration firmly believes that Iran should not be allowed to get nuclear weapons. The question is how to prevent that from happening, and [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu’s proposal is completely divorced from reality in terms of any likelihood it will work," Acton concluded.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- The Latest Iran Deal Ignores the Lessons of the Past
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Lebanon Should Try to Place Hezbollah on the U.S.-Iran TableCommentary
As talks begin between Washington and Tehran, Beirut has an opening to advance a regional plan for the party’s disarmament.
Michael Young
- Board Up Donald Trump’s Failed Board of PeaceCommentary
What is behind Marco Rubio’s announcement that the body is now an international nongovernmental organization?
Zaha Hassan
- Looking Past the Wall on Palestine-IsraelCommentary
Policy discussion is ignoring that the Palestinian national project is hollowed out and apartheid is a present danger.
Nathan J. Brown
- World Cup 2026: A Middle East and North Africa PrimerCommentary
This will be the region’s most representative tournament, amid broad changes in its footballing landscape.
Issam Kayssi
- Israel’s Security Means Insecurity in the Middle EastCommentary
As negotiations with Iran and Lebanon continue, chaos is at the heart of the Netanyahu government’s calculations.
Michael Young
