Commentary
Yezid Sayigh
{
"authors": [
"Yezid Sayigh"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
No Russin'?
The conflict in Syria is a complex one with different world powers and the Syrian opposition playing different roles that have changed over time.
By Yezid Sayigh
Published on Jul 17, 2016
Source: RT
Yezid Sayigh discussed Russia’s strategy in Syria in an interview with Oksana Boyko on the Worlds Apart program on Russia Today. He elaborated on the degree of Russia’s leverage over the Assad regime, its interaction with the West, and future prospects for a potential political settlement.
Sayigh argued that the regime is unwilling and unable to change, so it resorted to a military confrontation. The regime did not accept Russia’s proposal for a political settlement, which was the most realistic one. Sayigh pointed out that it does not have enough leverage to force the regime in accepting the proposal.
In the case of the Syrian opposition, Sayigh clearly stated its mistakes at the beginning of the conflict. He pointed out that the opposition should have considered several steps to be taken before demanding Assad to step-down.
On the US- Russian military collaboration to fight the Islamic State, Sayigh explains that the US has come to terms that Syria is a Russian battlefield. The new administration will eventually adopt a similar approach to Obama with less involvement and effective Russian collaboration.
About the Author
Yezid Sayigh
Senior Fellow, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Yezid Sayigh is a senior fellow at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, where he leads the program on Civil-Military Relations in Arab States (CMRAS). His work focuses on the comparative political and economic roles of Arab armed forces, the impact of war on states and societies, the politics of postconflict reconstruction and security sector transformation in Arab transitions, and authoritarian resurgence.
- What Is Israel’s Plan in Lebanon?
- All or Nothing in GazaCommentary
Yezid Sayigh
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Hezbollah’s Wartime StrategyCommentary
The party’s objectives involve tying together the Lebanese and Iranian fronts, while surviving militarily and politically at home.
Mohamad Fawaz
- A Mission for Lebanon’s ArmyCommentary
While armed forces commander Rudolph Haykal’s caution is understandable, he is in a position to act, and must.
Michael Young
- Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.Commentary
The simple conclusion is that the scheme will bring neither peace nor prosperity, but will institutionalize devastation.
Nathan J. Brown
- Israel Strikes Hezbollah’s Muslim Brotherhood-Affiliated AlliesCommentary
The Jamaa al-Islamiyya is the local Lebanese dimension of a broader struggle involving rival regional powers.
Issam Kayssi
- Syria Skirts the Conflict With IranCommentary
In an interview, Kheder Khaddour explains that Damascus is trying to stabilize its borders, but avoiding war isn’t guaranteed.
Michael Young
