For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.
James D.J. Brown
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Carnegie
For Immediate Release: April 3, 2003
Contact: Mike Boyer, 202-939-2345, mboyer@ceip.org
Foreign Policy Named a Finalist For Magazine Industry's Most Prestigious Award
The American Society of Magazine Editors (ASME) has announced that FOREIGN POLICY is a finalist for the 2003 National Magazine Award for General Excellence. FOREIGN POLICY is the only international affairs publication to be named a finalist for this year's awards. In 2001, FP won the Editorial Excellence Award presented by Folio, the magazine industry's leading trade publication.
The National Magazine Awards have been presented annually for 37 years and are the most prestigious honors in the magazine industry. The 2003 finalists were chosen from among 1,305 entries by a judging panel comprising 160 editors, art directors, educators, and media experts. The winners will be announced in New York City on May 7, 2003.
"We are thrilled that the National Magazine Award judges have named us a finalist for this year's award," said FOREIGN POLICY Editor & Publisher Moisés Naím.
"When we relaunched FP as a bimonthly, full-color magazine almost three years ago, we believed there was a new and growing market of readers who understand that what happens 'there' matters 'here'-and vice versa," Naím added. "Since the relaunch, FOREIGN POLICY has experienced the fastest growth in circulation in the magazine's 33-year history. I think this nomination for a National Magazine Award is further evidence that we're succeeding in our mission to provide compelling, jargon-free, yet rigorous analysis of the ways in which new international realities are reshaping nations, institutions, cultures, and, more fundamentally, our daily lives. Indeed, this nomination reinforces our belief that we're putting out the world's finest magazine of global politics, economics, culture, and ideas."
FP's National Magazine Award entry is composed of three FP issues: "Brand Name Bullies" (March/April 2002), "The Incredible Shrinking Eagle" (July/August 2002), and "Where is the International Community?" (September/October 2002).
ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY
Founded in 1970, FOREIGN POLICY
is the premier, award-winning magazine of global politics, economics, and ideas.
FOREIGN POLICY has subscribers in more than 90 countries and has editions in
Arabic, Greek, Italian, Spanish (three versions), and Turkish. FOREIGN POLICY
is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
###
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.
James D.J. Brown
The risk posed by Lukashenko today looks very different to how it did in 2022. The threat of the Belarusian army entering the war appears increasingly illusory, while Ukraine’s ability to attack any point in Belarus with drones gives Kyiv confidence.
Artyom Shraibman
Instead of a guaranteed ally, the Kremlin now perceives Armenia as yet another hybrid battlefield where it is fighting the West.
Mikayel Zolyan
China has found a unique niche for itself within the global security ecosystem, eschewing military alliances to instead bolster countries’ internal stability using law enforcement. Authoritarian regimes from the Central African Republic to Uzbekistan are signing up.
Temur Umarov
What should happen when sanctions designed to weaken the Belarusian regime end up enriching and strengthening the Kremlin?
Denis Kishinevsky