• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf"
  ],
  "type": "testimony",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Testimony

A World Transformed: The Great Hollowing Out and the Rise of New Threats

The turmoil of the global economic crisis will beget political turmoil, posing a range of security threats that the U.S. must address carefully and pointedly.

Link Copied
By David Rothkopf
Published on Mar 12, 2009

Source: House Armed Services Committee Hearing

While it is still too early to determine for how long the economic dimensions of the global downturn will continue to challenge leaders and populations worldwide, it is already clear that economic turmoil will inevitably beget political turmoil. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, David Rothkopf explained how to look at the different ways that the crisis is likely to impact geopolitics and U.S. national security interests. He presented a taxonomy of threats followed by examples of specific flashpoints around the world.

Rothkopf outlined a range of dire forecasts for the global economy, then elaborated on the ways the crisis will drive destabilization on national, regional, and global scales. Ultimately, the destabilizing effects of the crisis will spark geopolitical tensions with far-reaching impacts. He stressed that the U.S. must choose its priorities carefully and address the most critical issues first.

 The greatest threats associated with the crisis include:

  • The economic and political constraints placed on the United States
     
  • The economic and political constraints placed on the EU, China and other potentially stabilizing actors
     
  • The crisis of confidence in institutions worldwide, and the threats to the international system
     
  • The exacerbation of critical threats associated with proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
     
  • The consequences of protracted crisis for the world’s weakest states
     
  • The threats to weak and weakened states directly impacting U.S. national interests

To address these threats, Rothkopf offered a set of recommendations that could minimize the national security risks posed by the crisis.

Key recommendations for U.S. policy:

  • Be strategic about marshalling and maintaining U.S. Resources (exercise fiscal restraint and rethink defense budgeting)
     
  • Maximize the means of leveraging U.S. power (maintaining critical institutions and alliances)
     
  • Lead a coordinated, proactive global effort to reduce, eliminate or contain threats (beginning with economic threats)
     
  • Maintain a credible deterrent against bad actors
     
  • Recognize the likelihood of crises emerging beyond the Iraq and Afghanistan-Pakistan conflicts that currently preoccupy the U.S.
     
  • Fight the temptation to turn inward at home and abroad

About the Author

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    How Bush, Obama, and Trump Ended Pax Americana

      David Rothkopf

  • In The Media
    A Bigger Clubhouse

      David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf
Former Visiting Scholar
David Rothkopf
SecurityMilitaryEconomyForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Exporting Its Fuel Crisis to Central Asia

    When faced with fuel shortages in the past, Central Asian governments could always count on additional supplies from Moscow. That safety net no longer exists.

      Galiya Ibragimova

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Approaching a Political Crossroads

    Two divergent trends—Putin’s hardline vision of how to prosecute the war in Ukraine, and a growing desire for change in Russia—could tear the regime apart. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?

    Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.

      Leonid Bershidsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the Kremlin

    Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s Weakness

    The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.

      Artyom Shraibman

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.