Commentary
The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.
Dmitry Kuznets
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Wrong to target migrants during crisis
The global financial crisis disproportionately burdens migrants, but policy makers are still under pressure to enact new immigration restrictions. In the wake of the crisis, governments must resist these political pressures and instead recognize that migrants make a large economic contribution to both host and home countries.
Published on Dec 14, 2009
WASHINGTON, Dec 14—The global financial crisis disproportionately burdens migrants, but policy makers are still under pressure to enact new immigration restrictions. In the wake of the crisis, governments must resist these political pressures and instead recognize that migrants make a large economic contribution to both host and home countries, contends a new policy brief by Uri Dadush and Lauren Falcao.
Key Points
- Migrants increase economic welfare in host countries by lowering the costs of crucial services, improving international competitiveness in industry, and strengthening domestic demand and investment.
- Migration responds to the demand for labor in host countries. The number of migrants increases during economic booms and decreases during busts, thereby minimizing competition between migrants and native-born workers. Unemployment hits migrants hardest and deters their arrival.
- New restrictions on immigration may be counterproductive as they are hard to overturn and can discourage migrants from returning home temporarily.
- Migration restrictions hurt developing countries. Over 80 percent of migrants are from developing countries and their remittances—estimated to be $305 billion in 2008—are essential sources of foreign exchange and help countries fight poverty.
Policy Recommendations
- Policy makers need to better explain migrants’ contribution to their own citizens’ economic welfare.
- Host countries should avoid policies that punish migrants, as they are inefficient and will hurt firms and individuals that depend on migrants.
- Governments should adopt policies that promote the integration of migrants because they will maximize economic benefits in the long term and minimize tensions during economic downturns.
- Collaboration between host and home countries and temporary migration programs can help take full advantage of the economic benefits of migration and reduce frictions.
“Governments must recognize that migrants are an economic asset rather than a liability and thus shape their reaction to the global financial crisis, including migration and social policies, accordingly,” write Dadush and Falcao. “Failure to do this would result in both short- and long-term economic welfare losses and could lead to a disastrous escalation of social tensions.”
###
NOTES
- The Carnegie International Economics Program monitors and analyzes short- and long-term trends in the global economy, including macroeconomic developments, trade, commodities, and capital flows, and draws out policy implications. The current focus of the Program is the global financial crisis and the policy issues raised. Among other research, the Program examines the ramifications of the rising weight of developing countries in the global economy.
- The International Economic Bulletin draws on the expertise of Carnegie's global centers to provide a candid view of the economic crisis and its political implications. Addressing the momentous challenges of the economic downturn will require objectivity, and the ability to analyze the political dimensions of reforms around the world.
- Press Contact: David Kampf, 202/939-2233, dkampf@ceip.org
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?
- Including Russia on the EU Financial Blacklist Will Hurt Ordinary People, Not the KremlinCommentary
The paradox of the European Commission’s decision is that the main victims will not be those it formally targets. Major Russian businesses associated with the Putin regime have long adapted to sanctions with the help of complex schemes involving third countries, offshore companies, and nonpublic entities.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- Why Didn’t the Ukraine War Turn Russia’s Ruling Class Against Putin?Commentary
A new book by Alexandra Prokopenko looks at why the Russian ruling class became the regime’s willing servants—and how they might fare in a post-Putin world.
Vladislav Gorin
- Collateral Damage: The Frozen Foreign Assets of Middle-Class RussiansCommentary
The volume of frozen private assets might seem insignificant compared with Russia’s sovereign reserves, but these are the savings of millions of people who believed that foreign securities were a safe investment and in the institution of private property.
Yulia Starostina
- The Kremlin Has Weaponized Western Financial Checks to Punish Russian DissidentsCommentary
International compliance and anti-money laundering standards are currently formulated in such a way that the Western financial system does not differentiate between Russian political prisoners and ISIS militants.
Alexandra Prokopenko
