• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Pieter Bottelier"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Beijing's New Challenge: China's Post-Crisis Housing Bubble

The central bank of China has cautiously begun to tighten monetary policy in response to a massive residential property bubble, demonstrating Beijing’s belief that it has both the policy tools and the political will to control the bubble and avoid a burst.

Link Copied
By Pieter Bottelier
Published on Jul 1, 2010

With an overheating economy and an expanding bubble in residential property, China began tightening its monetary policy in early 2010. Pieter Bottelier writes that an uncontrolled collapse of the housing market is unlikely if Beijing can effectively cool speculative demand for housing. Still, China should remain wary of the potentially destabilizing social consequences associated with unaffordable housing.

Key Conclusions

  • Bubble largely due to loose monetary policy. Concentrated in eastern cities, China’s residential property bubble is mainly the result of excessive credit expansion in 2009. Other factors include significant inflows from abroad, low bank deposit rates, widespread property speculation, corruption, and incentives for local governments to drive up land prices to augment local fiscal revenues.
  • Beijing recognizes the risks and appears determined to control the property bubble. The central bank has carefully begun tightening monetary policy, but greater reliance is placed on administrative measures to reduce property speculation.
  • Bubble unlikely to burst. If Beijing effectively uses the policy tools at its disposal, an uncontrolled meltdown will likely be avoided. But a market correction of 20–30 percent over the next 6–12 months is likely.
  • Housing prices are key social and political issue. Housing affordability for first-time home buyers has become a major social and political issue and could trigger potentially destabilizing public discontent—even if the property bubble can be controlled. Accordingly, the government has started ambitious national “affordable housing” programs.

 “Given the scarcity of land and high population density in eastern China, residential property prices will tend to be high relative to incomes, even if there is a market correction in the near-term,” writes Bottelier. “Widespread discontent over housing affordability could become a source of social instability and is for that reason very much on the government’s radar screen.”

About the Author

Pieter Bottelier

Former Nonresident Scholar, International Economics Program

Bottelier was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s International Economics Program and senior adjunct professor of China studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the Johns Hopkins University. His work currently focuses on China’s economic reform and development.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    China's Economy is Slowly Becoming More Normal

      Pieter Bottelier

  • Article
    China's Economy: Slower Growth, But Structural Reforms Progressing

      Pieter Bottelier

Pieter Bottelier
Former Nonresident Scholar, International Economics Program
Pieter Bottelier
Political ReformEconomyEast AsiaChinaAsia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Ten Years After Karimov’s Death, How Much Has Uzbekistan Really Changed?

    In the tenth year of his presidency, President Mirziyoyev’s system is becoming even more personalized than that of his predecessor Karimov.

      Galiya Ibragimova

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World Order

    With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    As a Former Defense Minister Revolts in Ukraine, Is Zelensky’s System Fracturing?

    The greater threat to Zelensky comes not from Fedorov alone, but from the convergence between the former defense minister’s political campaign and the anti-corruption investigations moving ever closer to the presidential administration.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Fedorov’s Challenge to Zelensky Could Upend Ukrainian Politics

    With his public call for new elections in Ukraine, ex-defense minister Mykhailo Fedorov has opened Pandora’s box.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Rubber-Stamp Duma Elections Are Exposing Schisms in Putin's Regime

    In the discussions made possible by the State Duma election campaign, one question is being asked more and more loudly. “What next?”

      Andrey Pertsev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.