Uri Dadush
{
"authors": [
"Uri Dadush"
],
"type": "testimony",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Western Europe",
"France",
"Germany",
"Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade",
"EU"
]
}Source: Getty
G20 Must Help Manage Eurozone Crisis
An economic crisis comparable in size and virulence to the Lehman Brothers episode could erupt if Italy and Spain lose their ability to borrow. The G20 must act now to stabilize the eurozone.
Source: October 20

Policy Recommendations:
- Build a firewall around Italy and Spain: The G20 must lead an effort to expand the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) resources by about $1 trillion to supplement efforts already underway in Europe. Such a step represents a relatively cheap form of insurance for the United States and other G20 economies measured against the catastrophic consequences of a eurozone collapse.
- Impose demanding conditions on Europe: The IMF should impose strict conditions to ensure the EU currency union is sustainable in the very long run. This needs to include new fiscal and monetary arrangements, a powerful European banking authority, mechanisms for managing default and exit from the eurozone, and structural reforms that increase product and labor market flexibility inside the union.
- Foster open international trade and reform the WTO: By encouraging “plurilateral” negotiations—among a critical mass of countries, rather than the entire WTO membership—the G20 could establish a new, much more flexible negotiating framework capable of yielding gains across a wide range of sectors in the decades to come.
- Focus on the big picture: Despite suggestions that it is not representative and lacks technical expertise, the G20 should continue to serve as a sort of global steering committee, coordinating the response to crises and providing general guidance for how the international institutional architecture should evolve.
Dadush concludes, “Above all, the G20 needs to avoid the temptation to be all things to all nations and instead keep its eye on the ball—the systemic short- and long-term global policy issues that affect all nations and require major coordinated reforms. It also needs to know how to pick its fights and focus on those issues where there is a genuine emerging consensus about what to do.”
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.
- The Labors of TsiprasCommentary
- Greece, Complacency, and the EuroIn The Media
Uri Dadush
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Price Analysis Shows China Holds Upper Hand in Russia Gas Supply TalksCommentary
A leak of Russian gas price data helps establish that China is paying Russia far less than Central Asian countries and Gazprom’s former European customers.
Sergey Vakulenko
- The Future of Russian-European Relations Is BleakCommentary
The truth of the strategic situation is that Europe and Russia are extremely unlikely to be able to “turn the page” on their confrontation within the next two decades.
Arkady Moshes
- How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?Commentary
Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic CapacityCommentary
Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.
Balázs Jarábik
- Who Is Funding Russia’s War in the 2027 Budget?Commentary
For every ruble allocated to social policy, health, and education in 2027, double that amount is earmarked for the army, the police, and the security services.
Alexandra Prokopenko