In The Media
Vikram Nehru
{
"authors": [
"Vikram Nehru"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Southeast Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
It’s Time Malaysia Liberalized Its Auto Sector
Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.
By Vikram Nehru
Published on Mar 2, 2012
Source: Star
Less noticed was an announcement by Khazanah that it had sold its 47.2% stake in Proton to conglomerate DRB-Hicom.
At first blush, this action appears to be another reformist measure by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who is seeking to burnish his credentials ahead of the elections.
But to be genuinely reformist, it is imperative that this divestiture of a flagship state enterprise now be followed by fundamental policy reforms to rejuvenate Malaysia’s ailing automobile sector and to give a boost to growth. Without such reforms, Malaysia’s automobile sector will continue to be a drag on the rest of the economy.The reality is that Malaysia’s automobile sector is protected from foreign competition by elaborately constructed barriers of tariffs, investment approval permits, differential excise taxes, subsidised credit, procurement arrangements and tax allowances.
Much of this is designed to protect Proton (and its domestic component suppliers), the brainchild of former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and the spoiled child of his and subsequent administrations. Despite its substantial political, policy and financial support, Proton’s share of the growing Malaysian car market has been declining.
The company now uses only 45% of its capacity and is steadily losing ground to its domestic and international competitors.
Divesting Proton to a private company is a good first step. Its new owner will be able to build new partnerships with global brands that could apply the latest technologies and rejuvenate the company’s product line. But new partners will be unwilling to join forces with Proton unless the new owners are given a free hand in deciding where to source component supplies and whom to employ.
If the new company continues to operate under the existing regulatory framework, then there will be little incentive to upgrade technologically and improve efficiency, and the new owners would expect to continue to receive significant resource transfers from the state through generous financial, regulatory, and institutional treatment that Proton has enjoyed since its establishment.
So Proton’s divestment on its own will do little to stimulate Malaysia’s automobile industry, which has fallen further and further behind its neighbor, Thailand.
In the short term, the status quo may serve vested interests in Malaysia’s automobile industry and in the political establishment. But the past has shown that it will do nothing in the long term to make it more competitive internationally.
The brave political decision would be to do the right thing – follow Proton’s divestment with measures that allow all car manufacturers, domestic and foreign, to attract the finest talent, source the best components from the most efficient and reliable suppliers, and permit competition on a level playing field.
Not only will this help Proton attract the right partner and get the international technology it so desperately needs to become internationally competitive, it will also give Malaysia’s entire automotive sector a new lease on life by attracting foreign investment, encouraging production at economies of scale, and potentially becoming a production hub for serving the South-East Asian car market.
The economy will receive a big boost and the electorate will rightly view the move as serving the national interest and signaling a decisive break from the past.
Policymakers need only look as far as India and Thailand to see the benefits that liberalization of the automobile sector can bring.
Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.
Then the sale of Proton to the private sector would be a useful first step in the opening up of Malaysia’s automobile sector, its re-integration into global supply chains, and would represent a significant down payment in Malaysia’s negotiations with Trans-Pacific Partnership countries.
This article was originally published in the Star.
About the Author
Vikram Nehru
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Nehru was a nonresident senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program. An expert on development economics, growth, poverty reduction, debt sustainability, governance, and the performance and prospects of East Asia, his research focuses on the economic, political, and strategic issues confronting Asia, particularly Southeast Asia.
- Southeast Asia, the Redback, and Reality
- Now Comes Aung San Suu Kyi’s True Test of LeadershipIn The Media
Vikram Nehru
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime CollapseCommentary
A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?Commentary
The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.
Salavat Abylkalikov
- Russian Market Sours for Belarusian State CompaniesCommentary
Minsk’s faith in the future of its larger neighbor’s economy is fading as Belarusian firms in Russia see record losses.
Olga Loiko
- Did Putin Return From China Empty-Handed?Commentary
With no key agreement signed on the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline, there is a risk that the window of opportunity for Russia will close if Chinese power generation becomes so green that new gas sources are no longer of any interest to Beijing.
Alexander Gabuev
- In Russia, Private Companies Have Been Left to Pick Up the Tab for Ukrainian Drone AttacksCommentary
The cost of air defense has become an unregistered tax on revenue for businesses. While military rents are consolidated in the federal budget, the costs of defense are being spread across the balance sheets of companies and regional governments.
Alexandra Prokopenko
