Vikram Nehru
{
"authors": [
"Vikram Nehru"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Southeast Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}Source: Getty
It’s Time Malaysia Liberalized Its Auto Sector
Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.
Source: Star

Less noticed was an announcement by Khazanah that it had sold its 47.2% stake in Proton to conglomerate DRB-Hicom.
At first blush, this action appears to be another reformist measure by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who is seeking to burnish his credentials ahead of the elections.
But to be genuinely reformist, it is imperative that this divestiture of a flagship state enterprise now be followed by fundamental policy reforms to rejuvenate Malaysia’s ailing automobile sector and to give a boost to growth. Without such reforms, Malaysia’s automobile sector will continue to be a drag on the rest of the economy.The reality is that Malaysia’s automobile sector is protected from foreign competition by elaborately constructed barriers of tariffs, investment approval permits, differential excise taxes, subsidised credit, procurement arrangements and tax allowances.
Much of this is designed to protect Proton (and its domestic component suppliers), the brainchild of former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and the spoiled child of his and subsequent administrations. Despite its substantial political, policy and financial support, Proton’s share of the growing Malaysian car market has been declining.
The company now uses only 45% of its capacity and is steadily losing ground to its domestic and international competitors.
Divesting Proton to a private company is a good first step. Its new owner will be able to build new partnerships with global brands that could apply the latest technologies and rejuvenate the company’s product line. But new partners will be unwilling to join forces with Proton unless the new owners are given a free hand in deciding where to source component supplies and whom to employ.
If the new company continues to operate under the existing regulatory framework, then there will be little incentive to upgrade technologically and improve efficiency, and the new owners would expect to continue to receive significant resource transfers from the state through generous financial, regulatory, and institutional treatment that Proton has enjoyed since its establishment.
So Proton’s divestment on its own will do little to stimulate Malaysia’s automobile industry, which has fallen further and further behind its neighbor, Thailand.
In the short term, the status quo may serve vested interests in Malaysia’s automobile industry and in the political establishment. But the past has shown that it will do nothing in the long term to make it more competitive internationally.
The brave political decision would be to do the right thing – follow Proton’s divestment with measures that allow all car manufacturers, domestic and foreign, to attract the finest talent, source the best components from the most efficient and reliable suppliers, and permit competition on a level playing field.
Not only will this help Proton attract the right partner and get the international technology it so desperately needs to become internationally competitive, it will also give Malaysia’s entire automotive sector a new lease on life by attracting foreign investment, encouraging production at economies of scale, and potentially becoming a production hub for serving the South-East Asian car market.
The economy will receive a big boost and the electorate will rightly view the move as serving the national interest and signaling a decisive break from the past.
Policymakers need only look as far as India and Thailand to see the benefits that liberalization of the automobile sector can bring.
Malaysia’s National Automotive Policy is currently under review so the time is ripe for change. The objective should be to alter the incentive structure away from domestic market protection and toward increased competition.
Then the sale of Proton to the private sector would be a useful first step in the opening up of Malaysia’s automobile sector, its re-integration into global supply chains, and would represent a significant down payment in Malaysia’s negotiations with Trans-Pacific Partnership countries.
This article was originally published in the Star.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Nehru was a nonresident senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program. An expert on development economics, growth, poverty reduction, debt sustainability, governance, and the performance and prospects of East Asia, his research focuses on the economic, political, and strategic issues confronting Asia, particularly Southeast Asia.
- Southeast Asia, the Redback, and RealityIn The Media
- Now Comes Aung San Suu Kyi’s True Test of LeadershipIn The Media
Vikram Nehru
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus RealignmentCommentary
With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?Commentary
The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.
Dmitry Kuznets
- Lithuania’s Potash Dilemma Raises Questions About Sanctions’ EffectivenessCommentary
What should happen when sanctions designed to weaken the Belarusian regime end up enriching and strengthening the Kremlin?
Denis Kishinevsky
- Venezuela Is No Oil Eldorado, Despite U.S. and Russian ClaimsCommentary
Geological complexity and years of mismanagement mean the Venezuelan oil industry is not the big prize officials in Moscow and Washington appear to believe.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Including Russia on the EU Financial Blacklist Will Hurt Ordinary People, Not the KremlinCommentary
The paradox of the European Commission’s decision is that the main victims will not be those it formally targets. Major Russian businesses associated with the Putin regime have long adapted to sanctions with the help of complex schemes involving third countries, offshore companies, and nonpublic entities.
Alexandra Prokopenko