• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South America",
    "South Asia",
    "East Asia",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Will the Emerging Markets Boom Last?

Over the past 20 years, emerging economies have not only grown faster than advanced countries, but outperformed market expectations--leading to significant returns on investment. Whether this will be the case in the future remains to be seen.

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush
Published on Mar 30, 2012

Source: Il Espresso

The numbers are impressive. If you had invested a thousand dollars in emerging market equities 20 years ago and the same amount in advanced countries, today your investment in emerging markets would be worth nearly nine thousand dollars, almost three times your investment in advanced countries. Emerging market returns have outstripped those in advanced countries by an even larger margin over the past ten years. And over the last five years of crisis, you would have actually lost money investing in advanced countries but still made over 10 percent a year investing in emerging markets.

On the face of it, the reason for the extraordinary outperformance of emerging market equities is clear: growth. Over the last 20 years, emerging market GDP grew by 5.1 percent a year while advanced countries grew by only 2.2 percent a year, and this was broadly reflected in corporate earnings.

But wait, it is not so simple. After all, financial markets are supposed to be forward-looking, and the fact that emerging markets would grow faster was no secret even in 1992 (when, by the way, I first took on the task of forecasting emerging markets at the World Bank). Why didn’t markets reflect widely-held expectations that companies in emerging markets would grow faster in the price of their equities? A possible answer is that markets could not be sure that growth would be so rapid (in fact emerging economies and stock markets are more volatile than in advanced countries), so they priced the emerging equities at a discount. Moreover, in recent years they have kept getting surprised by the strong economic performance of emerging markets; in fact, at around 6.3 percent a year over the last five and ten years, emerging market growth outstripped most forecasts.

So, will emerging markets outperform advanced countries again in coming years? They are certainly expected to continue to grow faster. The World Bank’s latest forecast, for example, projects 5.7 percent GDP growth through 2013 for emerging and developing economies, compared to 1.7 percent in advanced economies, an even wider difference than in the past.

But are markets already pricing in these expectations? In fact, markets continue to discount emerging markets, though less than they used to. They should be pricing a dollar of earnings in emerging markets higher than in advanced countries because the latter are expected to grow less rapidly, but they are doing the opposite, valuing advanced country stocks at 12.6 times earnings and emerging market stocks at 10.4 times earnings. This means that if the growth projections by the World Bank are realized, and this is reflected in profits, you will do much better investing in emerging markets than in advanced countries (about 6% a year higher return, in fact). But that also assumes that the relative valuation of emerging market and advanced country earnings will not change, which leads to the second question: will markets be surprised again by rapid growth in emerging markets in coming years?

If I knew the answer to that question, I would be very, very rich. There is little doubt that emerging markets, which have young and rapidly growing populations and are absorbing advanced technologies, will grow rapidly over the very long run. But here are four reasons the next five or ten years could bring some disappointment. First, growth expectations have never been higher, raising the bar. Moreover, many emerging markets (Russia, Indonesia, Argentina for example) have done well from commodity exports, and history teaches that record high prices of commodities will, sooner or later, lead to a big expansion in supply and new technologies that will reduce any shortage. Third, record low interest rates and lack of confidence in advanced countries, which have encouraged investment to emerging markets and caused their currencies to appreciate, will not persist forever. Finally, several emerging markets are already showing signs of macroeconomic imbalances and misallocated investment (Brazil, Turkey, China) or loss of reform momentum (India).

Still, the long-term growth prospects of emerging markets are so strong and current valuations are attractive enough that if you are 40 years old and investing for your old-age, you will still likely do very well by putting a good share of it in emerging markets rather than in slow-growing and fiscally-challenged advanced countries.

About the Author

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Labors of Tsipras

      Uri Dadush

  • In The Media
    Greece, Complacency, and the Euro

      Uri Dadush

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
EconomySouth AmericaSouth AsiaEast AsiaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed Time

    Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.

      Alexey Gusev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?

    The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.

      Dmitry Kuznets

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Venezuela Is No Oil Eldorado, Despite U.S. and Russian Claims

    Geological complexity and years of mismanagement mean the Venezuelan oil industry is not the big prize officials in Moscow and Washington appear to believe.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Including Russia on the EU Financial Blacklist Will Hurt Ordinary People, Not the Kremlin

    The paradox of the European Commission’s decision is that the main victims will not be those it formally targets. Major Russian businesses associated with the Putin regime have long adapted to sanctions with the help of complex schemes involving third countries, offshore companies, and nonpublic entities.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Didn’t the Ukraine War Turn Russia’s Ruling Class Against Putin?

    A new book by Alexandra Prokopenko looks at why the Russian ruling class became the regime’s willing servants—and how they might fare in a post-Putin world.

      Vladislav Gorin

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.