- +10
Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …
{
"authors": [
"Moisés Naím"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Economy",
"Global Governance"
]
}Source: Getty
Changing the Cauldrons of Power
The decline of political and corporate power has been observed over the last two decades. Although there is much to celebrate, there is also cause for concern over the ability to push through an agenda and make decisions in a timely manner.
Source: MSNBC Morning Joe
Speaking on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Carnegie's Moisés Naím discussed the decline of political power around the world, as well as the decline of corporate power structures. Naím cited the monopoly once held by Kodak over the film and photography industries. Kodak has now filed for bankruptcy, while a small app of only 13 employees, known as Instagram, recently sold for a billion dollars. The probability of a company at the top of its sector falling out of this category has doubled over the last 20 years. Companies which responded correctly, such as IBM, have succeeded by adapting and developing a peripheral view while specializing in their field. Without this adaptation, Naím argues that tunnel vision will lead competition and competitors from the most improbable and unexpected places to take away customers.
This shift provides reasons for optimism, Naím explained: there is more competition, tyrants and monopolies are struggling to maintain their power, while new opportunities are available for voters, consumers, and activists. However, there is a downside. These changes can produce gridlock in governments and an inability to make decisions in a timely manner. New, small actors are entering the conversation, sitting at the table, and wanting to shape the outcomes. At times they are undermining initiatives, with no single actor holding enough power to push through an agenda. This is creating a detrimental state of fragile democracies, Naím concluded.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.
- The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 DaysResearch
- View From Latin AmericaCommentary
Moisés Naím
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Control Above Reform: What’s Behind Ukraine’s Government and Security Reshuffle?Commentary
Ultimately, Zelensky sided neither with the reform camp nor with the military establishment as such, but with political control.
Balázs Jarábik
- Where Are President Tokayev’s Political Reforms Leading Kazakhstan?Commentary
Tokayev’s predecessor, Nursultan Nazarbayev, outlined arrangements for a power transition too soon and in too much detail, ultimately losing control over the process. Tokayev is determined not to meet the same fate.
Temur Umarov
- What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?Commentary
Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.
Leonid Bershidsky
- Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the KremlinCommentary
Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.
Konstantin Skorkin
- Moldova’s Ruling Party PAS Must Graduate From Crisis Management to State GovernanceCommentary
Whether PAS can refocus on the unfinished business of state-building may ultimately prove more consequential for Moldova’s European future than the pace of its accession negotiations.
Balázs Jarábik