• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Battle for Ukraine

The Russian-Ukrainian economic agreements look like Putin’s victory, but the Kremlin will have to deal with an array of powerful opponents. The battle for Ukraine has entered a new stage.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Dec 18, 2013

The Russian-Ukrainian economic agreements concluded on December 17, 2013, at the Kremlin look like a victory for President Vladimir Putin. As an anonymous Kremlin official told a Kommersant reporter, "They are now ours." True, the victory has come at a considerable cost: slashing the gas price by one-third and buying $15 billion worth of Ukrainian securities, an equivalent of extending a credit line. Putin, however, aims at something far bigger: integration of Ukraine into the Moscow-led Eurasian geopolitical unit.

In reality, this is a gamble. If Ukraine were really leaning toward Russia, no price would be too high to bail it out. This, however, is not the case now. Putin will have to work very hard indeed to persuade the Ukrainian economic elite and its political clients that they are better off with Russia than slowly walking toward the EU: a tough sell. Putin also knows he can trust almost no one of the Ukrainian politicians or oligarchs. As he makes Yanukovych and Co. an offer they cannot refuse, Putin will probably have to help a new pro-Russian Ukrainian elite emerge. This new elite will have to come up with a new Ukrainian project, to replace the current one which is built on Ukraine being apart from Russia. A very tall order, if at all possible—but unless Russia can accomplish this feat, it will eventually lose.

These are long-term goals. Meanwhile, the Kremlin will have to deal with an array of powerful opponents. The Euromaidan, as expected, has seen the Kremlin accords as Yanukovych's sellout to Putin. The Maidan of course will dissipate before the Christmas break and will not reconvene automatically. Its leaders are clearly not giants. However, the Maidan represents a new stage in the formation of a Ukrainian nation which sees itself as part of Europe, not Eurasia. The EU, now, must secretly feel relieved: it is off the hook, having narrowly escaped the disaster of taking responsibility for a huge basket case. It will not, however, accept defeat easily and will work with the Maidan in the future. For the United States, Russia's geopolitical advance is unacceptable, and Washington will work to stymie it. With presidential elections in Ukraine scheduled for early 2015, next year looks crucial in determining the future direction of that country. Russia's bid has been accepted; the battle for Ukraine has entered a new stage.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
EconomyForeign PolicyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Will Hungary’s New Leader Really Change EU Policy on Russia and Ukraine?

    Orbán created an image for himself as virtually the only opponent of aid to Ukraine in the entire EU. But in reality, he was simply willing to use his veto to absorb all the backlash, allowing other opponents to remain in the shadows.

      Maksim Samorukov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is There a Place for Russia in the New Race Back to the Moon?

    Despite having the resources and expertise, the Russian space industry missed the opportunity to offer the United States or China a mutually rewarding partnership in the lunar race.

      Georgy Trishkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Power, Pathways, and Policy: Grounding Central Asia’s Digital Ambitions

    Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.

      Aruzhan Meirkhanova

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Conspiracy Theories Are Eclipsing the Real Dangers of Russia’s Messaging App Max

    The internet is awash not only with instructions from digital security experts, but also with urban legends and conspiracy theories that divert attention away from the real dangers of Max.

      David Frenkel

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.