• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Christopher Smart"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "americanStatecraft",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "ASP",
  "programs": [
    "American Statecraft"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

The Three Likeliest Causes of the Next Emerging Markets Correction

Will today’s market euphoria die from a political heart attack, the excesses of greed and leverage or the cumulative effects of old age?

Link Copied
By Christopher Smart
Published on Jan 25, 2018

Source: Medium

Markets power higher, apparently oblivious to the signs that they should be topping out. Handwringing about stretched price-to-earnings ratios, tight bond spreads and Bitcoin mania hardly matter amid a rare and roughly consistent story of synchronized global growth and ample liquidity.

And yet, an unmistakable sign of the approaching top is the perennial narrative at this stage of the cycle that Emerging Markets have entered a new phase of maturity that has made them better investments and perhaps more resilient to potential global financial shocks. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is up roughly 30 percent over the last year, compared to roughly 18 percent for the S&P 500. This time just may be different.

But it’s not.

The logic runs that countries like Brazil and Russia and India have better fiscal discipline that improves their credit risk (true), flexible currencies that absorb external financial shocks (true) and better growth prospects (mostly true). Their markets have also continued to rise in spite of the classic sell-signal in past cycles: the prospect of higher U.S. interest rates and a stronger dollar, which has consistently led to a rapid outflow of hot money from these places. So far, there are few signs of any new so-called ‘taper tantrum’ and outflows from Emerging Markets overall have been modest at best.

And yet for however long this happy trend persists, investors should be under no illusions that there will be a turn. And when that comes, the flight to safety will not be in the direction of Sao Paolo or Moscow or Mumbai.

The only real question is what will be the actual trigger. Will today’s market euphoria die from a political heart attack, the excesses of greed and leverage or the cumulative effects of old age?

There are a number of clear political landmines on the road ahead. President Trump’s new National Security Strategy released this week promises fresh new confrontations with China over trade and investment policy, suggesting increased turmoil for the bilateral economic relationship. Yet if the disputes are mainly limited to technical analyses of pricing practices in specific industries, the broader impact may be limited.

In Mexico, next July’s presidential election campaign is heating up and the mounting resentment of Trump Administration’s policies on trade and immigration may boost the prospects of left-wing populist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. The Mexican peso is a large and liquid market, which makes it a prime vehicle for investors who want to reflect their broader views on Emerging Markets. There are messy scenarios ahead in Brazil, too, if former president Luiz Inazio Lula da Silva returns to power in the October election in spite of last year’s corruption conviction.

Elsewhere, however, there are few dramatic political events on the Emerging Markets calendar. Russia’s presidential election results in March are certain to extend Vladimir Putin’s term. Consequences from the standoff with North Korea or the collapse of Venezuela are difficult to predict, but they are being closely watched and it’s hard to see how either of them might dramatically change broader earnings or growth forecasts across emerging economies.

Alternatively, such dramatic market runs often collapse from the greed that leads to over-borrowing, although this seems less a concern in Emerging Markets than the developed world. The IMF’s latest Financial Stability Report notes that household debt to GDP in emerging economies has risen from 15 percent in 2008 to 21 percent in 2016, but remains well below the 63 percent recorded in advanced economies.

The risks will rise as increasingly exotic borrowers like Iraq and Tajikistan tap into global markets, and investors reach yield amid otherwise low interest rates. Even Greek debt now pays less than 4 percent. Still, Emerging Market leverage should not present much of a problem as long as global growth remains strong and balanced.

So, keep a sharp eye on growth.

If shock and greed seem less likely causes of the next selloff at this stage, markets ultimately remain vulnerable to the logic of the cycle. Profitable growth attracts both new capital and competition, which squeezes profit margins and reduces earnings. If there are inflationary pressures that cause interest rates to rise, then borrowing costs will squeeze the profits even faster. Markets simply age out.

In 2018, the U.S. economy may face stiffer headwinds if the Fed is forced to tighten faster than current expectations, and the European Central Bank will be closer to tightening, too. In Emerging Markets, most forecasts differ on how quickly China will slow rather on whether it will. If the recent strength in commodity prices moderates, that will undercut export revenues, too.

If Emerging Markets investors keep these risks in mind, the next market turn may be mostly a large cyclical correction that sets the stage for a new phase of profitable growth. But if they forget the inevitable logic of the cycle amid all the signs of apparent progress, they will more likely need to brace for a punishing crash.

This article was originally published in Medium.

About the Author

Christopher Smart

Former Nonresident Fellow, Geoeconomics and Strategy Program

Christopher Smart was a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on the interaction of global financial markets and international economic policy.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Making U.S. Foreign Policy Work Better for the Middle Class
      • +8

      Salman Ahmed, Wendy Cutler, Rozlyn C. Engel, …

  • Report
    U.S. Foreign Policy for the Middle Class: Perspectives From Nebraska
      • +14

      Salman Ahmed, Allison Gelman, Tarik Abdel-Monem, …

Christopher Smart
Former Nonresident Fellow, Geoeconomics and Strategy Program
Economy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?

    The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.

      Dmitry Kuznets

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Including Russia on the EU Financial Blacklist Will Hurt Ordinary People, Not the Kremlin

    The paradox of the European Commission’s decision is that the main victims will not be those it formally targets. Major Russian businesses associated with the Putin regime have long adapted to sanctions with the help of complex schemes involving third countries, offshore companies, and nonpublic entities.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Didn’t the Ukraine War Turn Russia’s Ruling Class Against Putin?

    A new book by Alexandra Prokopenko looks at why the Russian ruling class became the regime’s willing servants—and how they might fare in a post-Putin world.

      Vladislav Gorin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Collateral Damage: The Frozen Foreign Assets of Middle-Class Russians

    The volume of frozen private assets might seem insignificant compared with Russia’s sovereign reserves, but these are the savings of millions of people who believed that foreign securities were a safe investment and in the institution of private property.

      Yulia Starostina

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Has Weaponized Western Financial Checks to Punish Russian Dissidents

    International compliance and anti-money laundering standards are currently formulated in such a way that the Western financial system does not differentiate between Russian political prisoners and ISIS militants.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.