• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Matthew T. Page"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "democracy",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "DCG",
  "programs": [
    "Democracy, Conflict, and Governance"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Southern, Eastern, and Western Africa"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

In Nigerian Politics, There Are No Permanent Friends and No Permanent Enemies

In Nigeria, shifting alliances might indicate the construction of strong opposition coalitions, but the ever-changing political field may present challenges for building good governance.

Link Copied
By Matthew T. Page
Published on Jul 12, 2018

Source: Quartz Africa

Lately, Nigerian political parties are a lot like Lagos’ iconic yellow danfo minibuses—swerving erratically, bulging as too many riders squeeze inside, their drivers’ clinging vise-like to both steering wheel and wads of naira notes. Monday was one such political rush hour, when 37 parties and a faction of president Muhammadu Buhari’s ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) party agreed to work together to unseat him February elections. Should Buhari be worried or will this pact—like a Lagos go-slow—generate a lot of noise but no forward momentum?

Impressive at first glance, this new anti-Buhari coalition is deceptively broad and not especially deep. At its core is the opposition People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which ran Nigeria from 1999 until 2015. Dogged and resilient, the PDP is nevertheless a shadow of its former self, still rebuilding its party structures after years of infighting. Lining up behind it are many smaller parties, most of which are ‘mom-and-pop’ operations.

These opportunistic parties possess little more than their acronyms, subsisting day-to-day by selling endorsements or renting themselves out to defeated APC or PDP primary candidates seeking a second chance to run in the general election. Some are used by ambitious politicians to build up sufficient voting strength to be co-opted by one of the major parties.

More damaging to Buhari, however, is the high-profile defection of a cadre of APC rebels—the so-called Reformed APC or rAPC—to this new PDP-led coalition. These rebels, which include a former Buhari confidente and campaign manager, reportedly enjoy the support of two APC bigwigs and known ‘frenemies’ of the president: Senate president Bukola Saraki and speaker of the House of Representatives Yakubu Dogara. The emergence of the rAPC and the PDP’s grand coalition suggests that Buhari’s reelection calculus is becoming increasingly complicated.

While still the odds-on favorite to win reelection, Buhari’s political power is visibly waning. His opponents continue to get mileage out of his many political weaknesses, including his aloof leadership style, his many unmet campaign promises, and his failure to address worsening violence between farmers and livestock herders. It is too early to say, however, whether the acquisition of a few second-tier APC rebels and several third-rate political parties amounts to anything more than a public relations win for the PDP. Neither groupings appear to add much to the PDP’s capacity to mobilize a significant number of voters nationally or sabotage APC power structures in particular states.

What Monday’s political theater does prove, however, is how fluid political loyalties in Nigeria have become. With barely a second thought, politicians routinely defect—’decamp’ or ‘cross-carpet’ in local parlance—in pursuit of new opportunities and financial resources. As a result, parties lack any discernible ideology or set of values other than a desire to hold on to power: a situation that begets poor governance and a corrupt political culture. As elections approach, it will be increasingly difficult to keep track of Nigeria’s shifting constellation of political elites whose favorite saying—“in politics, there are no permanent friends and no permanent enemies”—should give President Buhari pause.

This article was orginially published in Quartz Africa.

About the Author

Matthew T. Page

Former Nonresident Scholar, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program

Matthew T. Page was a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Two Voting Blocs That Could Transform Nigerian Politics

      Matthew T. Page, Feyi Fawehinmi

  • Paper
    Halting the Kleptocratic Capture of Local Government in Nigeria

      Matthew T. Page, Abdul H. Wando

Matthew T. Page
Former Nonresident Scholar, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Matthew T. Page
Political ReformDemocracySouthern, Eastern, and Western Africa

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

    After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?

    It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.

      Mikayel Zolyan

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?

    The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s Expense

    Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.

      Serik Beysembaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

    The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.

      Andrey Pertsev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.