Optimal Deterrence: How the United States Can Preserve Peace and Prevent a Nuclear Arms Race with China and Russia

Acton, James M.

Research

Optimal Deterrence: How the United States Can Preserve Peace and Prevent a Nuclear Arms Race with China and Russia

The United States should optimize its nuclear strategy—to maximize the deterrence benefits of its nuclear arsenal while reducing the risks of arms racing, escalation, and proliferation as well as the costs of modernization.

By James M. Acton

Published on Jun 18, 2025

Read the Publication

About the Author

James M. Acton

Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Recent Work

Commentary
What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy
- +10
  James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …
Paper
Nuclear Weapons and the Future of American Power
- James M. Acton, Ankit Panda

United States Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Could Nuclear Warheads Really Be Deployed to the Baltic States?
Latvia and Lithuania have been considering whether they could temporarily host NATO nuclear weapons in the event of war or a similar crisis.
Sergejs Potapkins
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Belarus Wants More From the West Than a ‘Massive Deal’ on Potash
Trump has promised Belarus a massive potash deal. But Minsk is seeking something greater: restored Western transit and greater room for maneuver from Russia.
Balázs Jarábik
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Have U.S.-Belarusian Negotiations Stalled?
Minsk clearly expected the dialogue with Washington to yield more results, in particular the lifting of EU sanctions and permission to export potash.
Artyom Shraibman
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Simmering U.S.-Iran Conflict Is Moscow’s Ideal Outcome
Ongoing uncertainty in the Middle East allows Moscow to both increase its influence in Tehran and continue to enjoy the financial windfall of higher oil prices.
Nikita Smagin
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
As Trump Threatens to Quit NATO, the Baltic States Are Playing for Time
Governments in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania want to ensure that a U.S. military withdrawal would not leave them dangerously exposed to a Russian attack.
Sergejs Potapkins

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Could Nuclear Warheads Really Be Deployed to the Baltic States?

Latvia and Lithuania have been considering whether they could temporarily host NATO nuclear weapons in the event of war or a similar crisis.

Sergejs Potapkins

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Belarus Wants More From the West Than a ‘Massive Deal’ on Potash

Trump has promised Belarus a massive potash deal. But Minsk is seeking something greater: restored Western transit and greater room for maneuver from Russia.

Balázs Jarábik

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Have U.S.-Belarusian Negotiations Stalled?

Minsk clearly expected the dialogue with Washington to yield more results, in particular the lifting of EU sanctions and permission to export potash.

Artyom Shraibman

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Simmering U.S.-Iran Conflict Is Moscow’s Ideal Outcome

Ongoing uncertainty in the Middle East allows Moscow to both increase its influence in Tehran and continue to enjoy the financial windfall of higher oil prices.

Nikita Smagin

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

As Trump Threatens to Quit NATO, the Baltic States Are Playing for Time

Governments in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania want to ensure that a U.S. military withdrawal would not leave them dangerously exposed to a Russian attack.

Sergejs Potapkins