Article
China has showcased its engineering prowess with small modular reactor demonstration projects. But turning these technological achievements into commercial success will be a greater challenge.
Tong Zhao
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"U.S. Nuclear Policy"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Iran",
"United Kingdom"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Press Release: Carnegie Endowment Supports Rice’s Statement on Iran
Published on May 31, 2006
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 31, 2006
CONTACT: Jennifer Linker, +1 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
Welcoming this morning’s statement on Iran by Secretary Rice, Carnegie President Jessica Tuchman Mathews said:
“This is an important step, which should be welcomed by the entire world, including Iran. The new policy advances both U.S. and global security interests by responding in a calm and sensible way to Iran's invitation to dialogue. A negotiated solution is the way forward and the Iranians must stop their enrichment and reprocessing activities for talks to proceed. It makes no sense to talk while they build. Now the onus is on the Iranian regime to respond in a similarly constructive manner.”
For related analysis and commentary from the Carnegie Endowment go to www.CarnegieEndowment.org
• “Speaking to Tehran, With One Voice,” Jessica Mathews
• “Russia and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis,” Alexei Arbatov
• “The Russia Card,” Rose Gottemoeller
• “Israel Urges U.S. Diplomacy on Iran,” Ze'ev Schiff
• “Bush Should Engage Iranian President in Dialogue, Not Back Away,” George Perkovich
• “Is the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime in Crisis?,” Pierre Goldschmidt
• “Options Available to the United States to Counter a Nuclear Iran,” George Perkovich
For commentary on the Iranian nuclear crisis from Carnegie experts based in Washington, DC, or Moscow please contact:
Peter Reid
Vice President for Communications (Washington)
Tel: +1 202 939 2319
preid@CarnegieEndowment.org
Jennifer Linker
Communications Manager (Washington)
Tel: +1 202 939 2372
jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
Natalia Bubnova
Deputy Director of Communications (Moscow)
Tel: + 7 495 935-8904 (ext. 230)
Natalia.Bubnova@carnegie.ru
###
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Can China Turn Its Small Modular Reactor Ambitions into Commercial Reality?
- Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its AlliesPaper
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
- When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly NonpartisanCommentary
For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.
Elina Noor
