A League of Their Own, July, 1, 2008

{
  "authors": [
    "Thomas Carothers"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "democracy",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "DCG",
  "programs": [
    "Democracy, Conflict, and Governance"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy"
  ]
}

In The Media

A League of Their Own, July, 1, 2008

Foreign-policy heavyweights on both the left and the right are calling for a new League of Democracies. One day, they say, it could replace the United Nations. But such a plan rests on the false assumption that democracies inherently work well together—or that anyone besides the United States thinks it’s a good idea.

By Thomas Carothers

Published on Jul 1, 2008

Source: Foreign Policy

New ideas are rare in international politics. The actions of countries on the world stage often seem like endless replays of ancient laws on power and conflict that are impervious to fresh insights and initiatives. And nowhere is the lack of new thinking more acute than in the realm of international institutions, where a set of multilateral organizations established in the wake of World War II still dominates.

Today, however, a big new idea for a new international institution has bubbled to the surface. It is the idea that the next U.S. president should seek to establish a “League of Democracies” (or “Concert of Democracies,” as it is sometimes called). The league would be a free-standing organization separate from—and perhaps one day even replacing—the United Nations.

About the Author

Thomas Carothers

Harvey V. Fineberg Chair for Democracy Studies; Director, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program

Thomas Carothers, director of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, is a leading expert on comparative democratization and international support for democracy.

Recent Work

Commentary
When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?
- Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
Article
The Trump Administration’s Tangled Talk About Democracy Abroad
- Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier

Political Reform Democracy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

Commentary
China’s Rising Influence in the Middle East
Transactional relationships are stable but can be shallow.
+1
Paul Haenle, Maha Yahya, Benjamin Ho, …
Article
The Many “One Chinas”: Multiple Approaches to Taiwan and China
Beijing says that over 180 countries accept its “one China principle” regarding Taiwan, but the reality is more complicated.
Chong Ja Ian
Commentary
China’s Zero COVID Policy Is a Double-Edged Sword
Beijing must choose between preserving its pandemic narrative or facing more unrest.
Paul Haenle
Commentary
What the Russian War in Ukraine Means for the Middle East
It’s about managing oil prices, bread prices, and strategic partnerships.
+8
Amr Hamzawy, Karim Sadjadpour, Aaron David Miller, …
Commentary
Why U.S.-China Relations Are Locked in a Stalemate
Three months after the Biden-Xi summit, the two sides’ divergent framings of the bilateral relationship are hindering progress.
Paul Haenle, Sam Bresnick

A League of Their Own, July, 1, 2008