Article
Pieter Bottelier
{
"authors": [
"Pieter Bottelier"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Asia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Beijing's New Challenge: China's Post-Crisis Housing Bubble
The central bank of China has cautiously begun to tighten monetary policy in response to a massive residential property bubble, demonstrating Beijing’s belief that it has both the policy tools and the political will to control the bubble and avoid a burst.
Published on Jul 1, 2010
With an overheating economy and an expanding bubble in residential property, China began tightening its monetary policy in early 2010. Pieter Bottelier writes that an uncontrolled collapse of the housing market is unlikely if Beijing can effectively cool speculative demand for housing. Still, China should remain wary of the potentially destabilizing social consequences associated with unaffordable housing.
Key Conclusions
- Bubble largely due to loose monetary policy. Concentrated in eastern cities, China’s residential property bubble is mainly the result of excessive credit expansion in 2009. Other factors include significant inflows from abroad, low bank deposit rates, widespread property speculation, corruption, and incentives for local governments to drive up land prices to augment local fiscal revenues.
- Beijing recognizes the risks and appears determined to control the property bubble. The central bank has carefully begun tightening monetary policy, but greater reliance is placed on administrative measures to reduce property speculation.
- Bubble unlikely to burst. If Beijing effectively uses the policy tools at its disposal, an uncontrolled meltdown will likely be avoided. But a market correction of 20–30 percent over the next 6–12 months is likely.
- Housing prices are key social and political issue. Housing affordability for first-time home buyers has become a major social and political issue and could trigger potentially destabilizing public discontent—even if the property bubble can be controlled. Accordingly, the government has started ambitious national “affordable housing” programs.
“Given the scarcity of land and high population density in eastern China, residential property prices will tend to be high relative to incomes, even if there is a market correction in the near-term,” writes Bottelier. “Widespread discontent over housing affordability could become a source of social instability and is for that reason very much on the government’s radar screen.”
About the Author
Pieter Bottelier
Former Nonresident Scholar, International Economics Program
Bottelier was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s International Economics Program and senior adjunct professor of China studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the Johns Hopkins University. His work currently focuses on China’s economic reform and development.
- China's Economy is Slowly Becoming More Normal
- China's Economy: Slower Growth, But Structural Reforms ProgressingArticle
Pieter Bottelier
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
