• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

U.S.–Russia relations cannot improve unless Russia reforms

The “reset” in U.S.–Russian relations has come with closer cooperation on arms control, Afghanistan, and Iran. But as long as Russia’s system of personalized power rests on anti-Western principles, a true reset is unattainable.

Link Copied
Published on Sep 9, 2010

WASHINGTON, September 9—The “reset” in U.S.–Russian relations has come with closer cooperation on arms control, Afghanistan, and Iran. But as long as Russia’s system of personalized power rests on anti-Western principles, a true reset is unattainable, writes Lilia Shevtsova.

In her new book Lonely Power, Shevtsova analyzes how Russia’s political system resists change and how the West hinders Russia’s transition to a democracy by accommodating its current leaders. Only political transformation in Russia can bring about the true shift in relations the West desires.

Key conclusions:

  • The U.S. “reset” is failing. The United States has secured only limited and temporary cooperation from Russia on key U.S. priorities.
  • Europe is unable to act as one. Moscow prefers to ignore the European Union and instead uses bilateral relations to gain tactical advantages.
  • Russia’s leaders try to use the West to reinvigorate the old system. President Medvedev’s modernization mantra bears no relation to reality and a veneer of democracy is used to protect an autocratic rule that is becoming more repressive.
  • Russians want change. While there are no insurmountable barriers for Russia’s path toward freedom, the West is hindering the reform process desired by many Russians by ignoring undemocratic practices.

Key recommendations for the West:

  • Hold Russia’s elite accountable. While only Russians can truly reform their country, incentives from the West can help encourage democratic behavior at home.
  • Think of Russia as a challenge. Developing a comprehensive long-term strategy toward Russia will not only help Russia integrate into the West, but also reinvigorate the West’s moral standing.
  • Encourage democratic transformation in the area. By promoting democracy and prosperity in the newly independent states neighboring Russia, the West can help establish an environment that fosters Russian reform.

###


 NOTES

  • Click here to order the book online.

  • Lilia Shevtsova is a senior associate at the Carnegie Moscow Center, where she chairs the Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program. She is also associate fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). Her previous books include Yeltsin’s Russia: Myths and Reality, Putin’s Russia, and Russia: Lost in Transition.

  • The Carnegie Moscow Center was established in 1993 and accommodates foreign and Russian researchers collaborating with Carnegie’s global network of scholars on a broad range of contemporary policy issues relevant to Russia—military, political, and economic.

  • The Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Program has, since the end of the Cold War, led the field on Eurasian security, including strategic nuclear weapons and nonproliferation, development, economic and social issues, governance, and the rule of law.

  • Press Contact: Kendra Galante, 202-939-2233, pressoffice@ceip.org
Political ReformForeign PolicyCaucasusRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    China’s Mediation Offer in the Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute Sheds Light on Beijing’s Security Role in Southeast Asia

    The Thai-Cambodian conflict highlights the limits to China's peacemaker ambition and the significance of this role on Southeast Asia’s balance of power.

      Pongphisoot (Paul) Busbarat

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.