• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf",
    "Bernard Schwartz"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Now Obama Needs to Talk Up America

President Obama should focus his State of the Union speech on stimulating job creation through investment in America's neglected infrastructure, trimming individual states' overly rich pension plans, and adopting an independent capital budget.

Link Copied
By David Rothkopf and Bernard Schwartz
Published on Jan 5, 2011

Source: Financial Times

Now Obama Needs to Talk Up AmericaAs Republican John Boehner accepted the Speaker’s gavel in the US House of Representatives on Wednesday he spoke of the duties of Congress to the American people. He did not, however, set out an agenda. That task is left to President Barack Obama at his State of the Union address in three weeks’ time – perhaps the most crucial speech of his presidency.

After a bruising year, Mr Obama enters 2011 energised by impressive legislative victories in December. His eyes (and those of his opponents) are already fixed on 2012. During his first two years Mr Obama’s instinct was to emulate the sweeping aspirations of presidents such as Ronald Reagan and John Kennedy. But if he is to match their stature, it is America’s extraordinary economic challenges, not its politics, that must shape his remarks.

The speech must acknowledge America’s difficulties. Economists predict growth of around 3 per cent this year, but unemployment is likely to hover near double digits well beyond 2011. This is the most protracted blow to the US labour force from any recession. But it is more than that. Not one net new job has been created in more than a decade, the first time that has happened in US history. While Mr Obama’s speech may touch upon the global trends that have helped drive these changes, the bulk of it and his time during the next two years must focus on what America can now do to stimulate job creation

This will require discipline. On the one hand this means avoiding distracting battles over otherwise important issues – like immigration reform, or rehashing healthcare. It also means resisting the temptation to score comparatively easier victories through bite-size legislative schemes – even these may appear to be the only things that appear digestible by the new, divided Congress. Current growth will generate only 100,000-150,000 jobs a month. This means 10m-15m additional jobs over the next six years are needed to get unemployment to historic levels. Given the urgency of America’s problems, thinking small is as dangerous as gridlock.

Just as importantly, the president must recognise his proposals need to be realistic in the context of the new environment in Washington. Given current concerns about the federal deficit, this means the answer cannot lie with further stimuli or big spending initiatives.

There is, however, a path that will allow both Mr Obama and Congress to craft an agenda on jobs growth. It begins with the fact that since we have for decades neglected our roads, highways, air traffic control systems, ports, power grids and telecoms infrastructure (so that today we lag behind many developing countries in our standards) it stands to reason that the best place to create jobs is in restoring these areas – especially since, in so doing, we will become more competitive and attract more investment.

What could be done? The president’s existing infrastructure bank could leverage $50bn in repayable capital into hundreds of billions in private investment. Removing the thicket of regulatory obstacles to modernising America’s energy infrastructure could release billions more in private money. Cutting corporate taxes could attract foreign investment.

Elsewhere, a tough stand may also be needed to get individual US states to trim overly rich public pension packages, to ensure their fiscal stability. This will be easier in an environment in which new infrastructure projects are creating demand, and enhancing the tax base. Finally, the federal government should adopt a long-overdue capital budget, to treat its investment spending differently from pure operating spending – just as all normal companies do.

The advantage of such a focus is that most of the money for these projects will come from the private sector. But bringing together Wall Street, private industry, foreign capital, pension funds and the other players who will be key to making such a broad programme a near-term reality requires the government to play the role of catalyst and advocate. If it does, in only a few short weeks Mr Obama can set out a plan to lift America and ensure his own re-election. What is more, by doing so through focusing boldly on America’s biggest challenge, and then working to implement a plan, he can mark an important turning point in US history.

About the Authors

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

Bernard Schwartz

Authors

David Rothkopf
Former Visiting Scholar
David Rothkopf
Bernard Schwartz
Political ReformNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

  • Commentary
    A Second Trump Term: Will Southeast Asia Tilt Toward China?

    Tapping our network of China experts in the region, Carnegie China offers this latest “China Through a Southeast Asian Lens” report to offer preliminary assessments of whether the U.S. effort to reshape the global trading order will lead countries in the region to tilt toward Beijing. 

      • +6

      Selina Ho, Khin Khin Kyaw Kyee, Joseph Ching Velasco, …

  • Commentary
    Is China Willing to Influence Russia on the Ukraine War?

    Beijing is trying to navigate the overall situation regarding Ukraine, especially the substance of interactions between Washington and Moscow.

      • Ellen Nakashima
      • Zhao Long
      • +1

      Ellen Nakashima, Zhao Long, Pavlo Klimkin, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.