Commentary
Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Could China's Efforts to Cool the Economy Be Working Too Well?
China’s high level of investment is causing a rapid rise in debt and will likely lead to a slowdown in the country’s economic growth.
Published on Jun 13, 2011
Source: Marketplace
STEVE CHIOTAKIS: There's word today out of China -- big banks handed out fewer loans in May. Perhaps a sign Beijing's efforts to cool an overheated economy could be making some headway. But how cool is too cool? Michael Pettis is an economist at Peking University in Beijing. Hi Michael.
MICHAEL PETTIS: Hi how are you?
CHIOTAKIS: Doing well. Is there a risk that the Chinese government will over reach and hinder the country economically, or even cause a slowdown?
PETTIS: A slowdown is inevitable. We've been going extremely rapidly over the last 30 years because of huge increases in investment. And there's increasing evidence that five years ago, perhaps even ten years ago, a very large amount of this investment was being misallocated. It was being used to build excess real estate development or excess infrastructure. And one of the consequences is that we've been seeing a very rapid rising in debt and I don't think we can do this many more years before we run into real trouble.
CHIOTAKIS: How has China avoided the economic downturn the rest of the world's experienced?
PETTIS: Well, it hasn't really avoided it. What it did was it postponed it. They responded to the 2007-2008 crisis by taking a country which already had the highest investment growth rate in history and significantly increasing it. Now when you increase investment, you always get growth. But if the investment is not economically viable, you give back all of that growth in the future and I'm afraid that's what may have happened here.
CHIOTAKIS: Michael Pettis, economist at Peking University in Beijing. Michael thanks.
PETTIS: Thank you.
About the Author
Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
