Commentary
Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan
{
"authors": [
"Yukon Huang"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Prospects for the Global Economy in 2013
Even as the currency war between China and the United States recedes, the battle over foreign investment and technology transfer policies will continue to escalate in the coming months.
By Yukon Huang
Published on Dec 27, 2012
Source: Council on Foreign Relations
Over the past year, markets were fixated on China's economic slowdown given the unrealistic hope that continued double-digit growth might compensate for the problems afflicting the OECD economies. But slower growth will be good for China if it represents a more sustainable path. As a maturing economy, quality rather than quantity of growth is what now matters.
With slackened import demand in the United States and Europe, China's already much reduced trade surplus will continue to decline. The renminbi is no longer significantly out of line, although the United States will probably be the last to acknowledge the new reality.
Currency wars will recede as the source of tension for the two countries, but circumstances will push them to battle over foreign investment and technology transfer policies. This is evident in the recent outcries over security risks as Chinese firms seek greater access to the U.S. market and U.S. firms are pressured to share valuable technologies as the price for accessing China's market.
China is the center of an Asian production sharing network that brings in components from other countries for assembly with export of the final product to the West. But these are low paying assembly jobs, and the priority now is to develop more sophisticated product lines that can generate the better paying positions needed to sustain rapid growth.
Beijing believes that this needs to come through development of "indigenous" technology, as was the case with South Korea and Taiwan. This involves securing the technological expertise either from abroad or developing it locally with or without the involvement of foreign partners. Thus tensions over technology transfer and respect for intellectual property rights will likely dominate discussions between the United States and China this coming year even as the rhetoric over exchange rates moderates.
This piece was originally published by the Council on Foreign Relations.
About the Author
Yukon Huang
Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.
- Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and BeijingCommentary
Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
