• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

The Connection Between Europe’s Nobel and Afghanistan

The European Union could make a difference both practically and strategically by putting in place a long-term development strategy for Afghanistan.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Dec 10, 2012

Source: New York Times

The European Union received the Nobel Peace Prize on Monday in recognition of the bloc’s commitment to peace and human rights.

Since the European Coal and Steel Community, a precursor of the Union, was founded soon after World War II, European countries have worked hard to overcome centuries of enmity and war.

The extraordinary lengths to which France and Germany have gone to promote reconciliation have provided a model for other countries seeking rapprochement.

The European Union’s promotion of values and its use of soft power have been extremely important for the countries of Eastern and Central Europe. When they joined the Union in 2004, Europe became reunited on the basis of democracy, human rights and stability.

But now it is time for the Union to ensure that the Nobel Peace Prize becomes a motivation to defend values beyond Europe, not just an honor about past achievements.

Afghanistan presents an ideal but difficult opportunity. The reason is that NATO forces are now drawing down, the theme of my latest Letter from Europe. The 102,000-strong force will end its combat mission in 2014. The NATO alliance says it will follow it up with a training mission for the Afghan military and police.

But nongovernmental organizations are concerned that the gains made by women and a younger generation of judges, journalists, lawyers and teachers will be reversed. This is because corruption is endemic, the Taliban and other insurgents oppose human rights and democracy, and the Afghan security forces are too weak to exert control.

The European Union could make a difference by putting in place a long-term development strategy for Afghanistan. This would require a highly disciplined and coordinated relationship with all the nongovernmental organizations involved in Afghanistan. That might be possible only with strong leadership from Brussels. Diplomats based in Afghanistan have seen much of the rivalry between nongovernmental organizations that makes coordination and cooperation difficult.

What happens in Afghanistan is important, not only for Afghans but also for the region. If the European Union were to adopt a radical, long-term development program that would establish a special relationship between locals and experts and that would focus on human rights and economic development, it could — and it’s a big ”could” — show to Afghanistan’s neighbors the relevance of being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyAsiaEurope

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    China’s Mediation Offer in the Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute Sheds Light on Beijing’s Security Role in Southeast Asia

    The Thai-Cambodian conflict highlights the limits to China's peacemaker ambition and the significance of this role on Southeast Asia’s balance of power.

      Pongphisoot (Paul) Busbarat

  • An aerial view shows containers stacked at a port in Taicang, in eastern China's Jiangsu province on May 18, 2025.
    Commentary
    How to Predict China’s Economic Performance for 2025: A Sectoral Approach

    GDP growth means something fundamentally different in China than in most countries.

      Michael Pettis

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.