• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Political Iran

Iran's elections may present a window of opportunity for the United States and the West.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Jun 15, 2013

Source: Indian Express

It is easy to be cynical about yesterday's elections in Iran to choose a new president. After all, the elected president does not dominate Iran's complex political system. That privilege belongs to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This does necessarily mean the current elections are inconsequential.

The 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran replaced the monarchy with a system called velayet-e-faqih, or rule by the clerics. Khamenei, sitting on top this structure, is only the second supreme leader since the republic was founded by Ayatollah Khomeini. While the president's powers are limited, not everyone is allowed to run for the job. Women are barred and the men are carefully vetted by the Guardian Council, the powerful 12-member body that has the mandate to interpret the constitution and approve candidates for the presidency and the parliament, called the Majlis.

This year, more than 600 men registered as candidates. The Guardian Council approved only eight. Those rejected included Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president, and Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, a close confidant of the outgoing president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The exclusion of Rafsanjani and Mashaei, who were at odds with Khamenei, has resulted in the widespread dismissal of the current elections as a sham. But politics has a way of asserting itself even within the highly controlled Iranian electoral process.

Mohammad Khatami surprised the world with his victory in the presidential elections of 1997 and 2001. Although he failed to change the system from within, the reformist current gained ground again in 2009 in the electoral battle between incumbent president Ahmadinejad and the challenger, Mir Hossein Mousavi.

When Ahmadinejad was declared winner by Khamenei, supporters of reformist Mousavi demonstrated for weeks, accusing the Supreme Leader of rigging the result. While Mousavi has been under detention since 2009, Ahmadinejad soon fell out with Khamenei and tensions between the two have dominated Iran's political landscape in the last few years.

With two of the eight candidates dropping out last week, the election has acquired a political edge that was missing until now. Moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani has gained some ground after the only reformist candidate on the slate, Mohammad Reza Aref withdrew this week.

Two former presidents, Rafsanjani and Khatami, have backed the candidacy of Rouhani, who had earlier served as Iran's national security advisor. In the last few days, Rouhani has promised women that he will end gender inequality in Iran and told students he will end their harassment by the ubiquitous moral police. Skeptics say Rouhani, once dubbed a radical, is hardly a reformer. Rouhani's supporters are wearing purple wristbands, much in the manner that Mousavi's backers wore green during the last elections and the protests that followed.

All the other candidates—including the popular mayor of Tehran, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili and former foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati—are said to enjoy the blessings of Khamenei.

A lot will depend on the turnout; more than 50 million are eligible to vote. If the supporters of change, demoralized since the last elections, turn up in large numbers, there could be a close contest. If no candidate wins 50 per cent of the vote on Friday, there will be a runoff between the top two candidates. If Rouhani is one of the two, the next round of the election on June 21 could turn out to be exciting. Many observers, however, say Rouhani's prospects are slim despite the inability of the conservatives to unite behind one candidate.

Although all candidates are opposed to Western sanctions and support Iran's right to develop a peaceful nuclear program, a recent television debate among the presidential candidates revealed considerable variation.

In the heated debate, Velayati, the former foreign minister accused Jalili, the current nuclear negotiator of being inflexible. "The art of diplomacy," Velayati said, is about "preserving our rights" and not "inviting sanctions." Rouhani said, "it is nice to have the centrifuges running, provided people's lives are also running." In his campaign rallies, Rouhani has promised to end the nuclear dispute with the international community and help remove economic sanctions.

The lack of flexibility is also a problem in the West, which has demonized Iran and treated it as a black box. Despite their limitations, the elections in Iran may offer a brief window for the United States to pursue an unconditional dialogue with Tehran on all issues of mutual concern.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Political ReformSecurityMilitaryForeign PolicyNuclear PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    China Sells Stability Amid American Volatility

    U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.

      Chong Ja Ian

  • Vietnam's Top Leader To Lam meets with young representatives from China and Vietnam participating in the "Red Study Tours" at the Great Hall of the People on April 15, 2026 in Beijing, China. T
    Commentary
    Why Vietnam Is Swinging in China’s Direction

    Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of Everything

    Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.


      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.