• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

National Unity Does Not Need a Special Day

There is no need to invent a special day like the National Unity Day for strengthening national identity, because one day in a year cannot change people's vision of their nation. This is an everyday job for the citizens at all levels of Russian society.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Nov 8, 2013

If the authorities have decided to invent the National Unity Day, it can mean that they believe in the need for special activities in the field of nation-building.

As it usually happens in Russia, the idea is correct, but its realization is poor. A special day, dedicated to the national unity, looks like the Women’s Day on March 8, when many Russian men buy flowers and gifts for their women. The question is whether there is a need for a special day to buy flowers for your woman? Of course, there is none. It can be done as often as you want.

The same can be said about the National Unity Day. There is no need to invent a special day for strengthening national identity, because one day in a year cannot change people's vision of their nation. This is an everyday job for the citizens at all levels of our society.

No doubt, the state has its own role. It has a lot of means of nation-building policy, including the state system of education, state museums and galleries, state-sponsored events, and so on.

I have not mentioned the armed forces and political parties, usually regarded as the instruments of nation-building policy, because the effectiveness of these instruments is not so evident.

The United Russia Party is a good example. Sometimes it seems that this party exists in a parallel reality, which has nothing to do with the Russian nation. Other parties do not differ a lot.

As for the army, it is a classic example of the nation-building instruments. The military history, the memories about heroes, the military service can help build the national identity. And they do this every day.

But there are a lot of problems in the armed forces today, which can destroy people's expectations, replacing their pride of their nation with disappointment. Unsuccessful launches of space rockets, widely discussed in our society, can prove this.

Even if the authorities learn how to use the nation-building instruments in a proper way, it does not mean that someday they will be able to state that their mission has been accomplished.

The nation-building is an infinite mission, firstly because of a change of generations, secondly because of the continuous development of the political environment, and thirdly because of an on-going cultural transformation of the society.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

  • In The Media
    Premonition of Nuclear Threat

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
Political ReformCivil SocietyRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Is China Willing to Influence Russia on the Ukraine War?

    Beijing is trying to navigate the overall situation regarding Ukraine, especially the substance of interactions between Washington and Moscow.

      • Ellen Nakashima
      • Zhao Long
      • +1

      Ellen Nakashima, Zhao Long, Pavlo Klimkin, …

  • Commentary
    The Challenges Behind China’s Global South Policies

    While China will remain a significant political and economic force in the Global South, its ambition to leverage the Global South as a counterbalance to the United States and the Global North is far from assured.

      Xue Gong

  • Commentary
    Beyond the Putin-Kim Alliance: How Can the International Community Engage China to Contain Nuclear Risks Over the Korean Peninsula?

    Faced with an increase in strategic maneuvering by Moscow and Pyongyang, Beijing will not sit idly by and allow Putin and Kim to shape the security environment on its behalf.

      Tong Zhao

  • Commentary
    What Does Xi Jinping Want From Central Asia?

    China’s growing attention to Central Asia is perceived as a harbinger of tectonic shifts in regional geopolitics.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    China-Europe Relations, Two Years After Russia Invaded Ukraine

    The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a turning point in the EU-China relationship, and evolution of the China-Russia relationship will continue to impact EU-China relations.

      Yifan Ding, Alice Ekman

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.